Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Madras High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Suriya vs. State Rep.by

Decided on 31 October 2024• Citation: CRL OP/24387/2024• Madras High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                     Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024     
                               Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024                           
            P.DHANABAL,   J.                                                      
                 The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under  
            Section 191(2), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS in   
            Crime No.141 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police seeks      
            anticipatory bail.                                                    
                 2.   The case of the prosecution is that due to some wordy quarrel
            between the parties, the petitioner along with other accused assaulted the
            defacto complainant using stones. Due to which, the defacto complainant
            sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.                             
                 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
            petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such    
            offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner has been falsely
            implicated in this case. However, on instructions, the learned counsel
            further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any
            conditions that may be imposed by this Court and he prays to grant    
            anticipatory bail to the petitioner.                                  
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 
            1/5                                                                   

                                                     Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024     
                 4.   The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing   
            for the respondent police submitted that due to some wordy quarrel    
            between the parties, the petitioner along with other accused assaulted the
            defacto complainant using stones. Due to which, the defacto complainant
            sustained injuries and two previous cases are pending against the     
            petitioner and further, considering the gravity of offence, he opposed for
            grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.                         
                 5.   Considering the representations made by both sides and      
            considering the nature of offences charged against the petitioner and 
            considering that there is a dispute pending between the petitioner and the
            defacto complainant in respect of bus route and injured was also      
            discharged from hospital and though two previous cases are pending    
            against the petitioner, in that cases also he was released on bail, this Court
            is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain 
            conditions.                                                           
                 6.   Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail
            in the event of arrest or on his/her appearance, within a period of fifteen
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 
            2/5                                                                   

                                                     Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024     
            (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the 
            Metropolitan Magistrate No.XIV, Egmore, on condition that the         
            petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten  
            Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction
            of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to
            the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further   
            condition that:                                                       
                     [a]  the petitioner shall report before the respondent       
                Police daily at 10.30 A.M for a period of 30 days;                
                     [b]  the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make  
                any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with   
                the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such  
                facts of the Court or to any police officer.                      
                     [c]  the petitioner shall not leave India without the        
                previous permission of the Court.                                 
                     [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during           
                investigation or trial.                                           
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 
            3/5                                                                   

                                                     Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024     
                     [e]  the petitioner shall make himself/herself available     
                for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.       
                     [f]  On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the       
                learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate    
                action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the    
                conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail  
                by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by     
                the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala        
                [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].                                             
                     [g]  If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can  
                be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.                            
                                                              03.10.2024          
            nsl                                                                   
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 
            4/5                                                                   

                                                     Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024     
                                                        P.DHANABAL,  J.           
                                                                    nsl           
                                                  Crl.O.P.No.24387 of 2024        
                                                              03.10.2024          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 
            5/5