Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Madras High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. December

The Manager, vs. Mangayarkarasi

Decided on 31 December 2024• Citation: CMA(MD)/770/2023• Madras High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
               BEFORE  THE  MADURAI   BENCH   OF MADRAS   HIGH  COURT             
                                DATED  :   31.12.2024                             
                                       CORAM                                      
                  THE  HONOURABLE     MRS.JUSTICE   R. KALAIMATHI                 
                              C.M.A(MD)No.770   of 2023                           
             The Manager,                                                         
             Reliance General Insurance Company Limited,                          
             141/3, First Floor, New By-pass Road,                                
             M.P.Sharathi Nagar,                                                  
             Vellore-6332 012.                 ... Appellant/2nd Respondent       
                                       -Vs-                                       
             1.Mangayarkarasi                                                     
             2.Minor Saishree                                                     
             3.Malika                                                             
             4.Subramani                                                          
             (Minor 2nd respondent is represented                                 
             by her mother and natural guardian                                   
             the first respondent)            ... Respondents1 to 4               
                                                            /Claimants            
             5.Elizabeth                      ... 5th Respondent/1st Respondent   
             PRAYER:  This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
             the Motor Vehicle Act, 1998, as against the award dated 08.03.2023   
             passed in M.C.O.P.No.528 of 2021 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/
             Principal District Court, Karur.                                     
             _________                                                            
             Page 1 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
                            For Appellant   : Mr.J.S.Murali                       
                            For R1 to R4    : No appearance                       
                            For R5          : Mr.N.Mohan                          
                                   J U D G M E N T                                
                     This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the    
             second respondent/Insurance Company, against the award dated         
             08.03.2023 passed in M.C.O.P.No.528 of 2021 by the MACT/Principal    
             District Court, Karur,.                                              
                     2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.               
                     3.This appeal is focussed on the question of liability and   
             quantum.                                                             
                     4.At trial, on the claimant's side, two witnesses were examined
             and sixteen documents were marked. On the respondent's side, no      
             evidence was let in.                                                 
             _________                                                            
             Page 2 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
                     5.P.W.2 is the ocular witness, who has spoken about the accident
             the evidence of P.W.2(Muthusamy @ Muthaian), it is inferable that on 
             05.03.2021 at about 08.30 p.m., while P.W.2 had been walking along   
             Thennilai - Chinnatharapuram road, the deceased was proceeding in his
             two wheeler(TN-37-CC-7849) from south to northern direction on the left
             side of the road, a four wheeler Tempo (Tn-88-H-1157)came towards    
             southern side in a rash and negligent manner and hit on the aforesaid two
             wheeler. Due to the said impact, the rider of the two wheeler Gowthaman
             sustained serious injuries and he was sent to the hospital in ambulance. He
             came to know that the injured succumbed to the injuries on the way to the
             hospital.                                                            
                     6.During his cross-examination, no details advantageous to the
             appellant was elicited and based on the ocular evidence of P.W.2, the
             Tribunal has concluded that it is because of the rash and negligent driving
             of the driver of Tempo Vehicle, the accident happened and the liability is
             fastened on the owner of the vehicle, first respondent and its insurer (R2).
             The said findings, does not suffer from infirmity or perversity.     
             _________                                                            
             Page 3 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
                     7.Next ground raised in this appeal is quantum. It is the evidence
             of P.W.1 that the deceased was aged about 25 years and he was earning
             Rs.25,000/ per month by working as painter. As per Ex.P.2-Post mortem
             Certificate, his age is fixed at 25 years. The date of the accident is
             05.03.2021. The Tribunal has fixed the notional income of the deceased at
             Rs.13,000/-. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has standardized the details of
             the future prospects while computing the monthly income in National  
             Insurance Company   Vs  Pranay Sethi and  others, reported in        
             2017(2)TNMAC 609(SC). For the persons below 40 years 40% has to be   
             added (13,000/ + 40% = 18,200/-). As the claimants are four in numbers,
             1/4th was deducted for personal and living expenses. For loss of income,
             based on the aforesaid details, the Tribunal arrived at Rs.29,48,400/-,
             rounded off to Rs.29,50,000/- and for loss of consortium to the first
             claimant, an amount of Rs.44,000/-, for loss of estate and for funeral
             expenses Rs.16,500/- was granted under each head. The Tribunal granted
             a sum of Rs.30,27,000/- as compensation.                             
                     8.The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that as
             per Ex.P.8-legal heir certificate, only the names of the wife and parents are
             _________                                                            
             Page 4 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
             given and minor child name is not found. The legal heir certificate would
             have been obtained by the claimants. Therefore, this Court does not find
             any force in the arguments of the learned counsel for appellant. Hence, as
             per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sarala Varma and
             others Vs Delhi Transport Corporation and another, reported in 2009(2)
             TNMAC  1, 1/4th is to be deducted for personal and living expenses of the
             deceased as the claimants are four in numbers.                       
                     9.As regards the quantum also, this Court finds no good reasons
             to disturb the findings of the Tribunal.                             
                     10.Based on the aforesaid discussions and observations, this 
             Court does not find any merits in the appeal. The Civil Miscellaneous
             Appeal stands dismissed.                                             
                     11.The Insurance Company/appellant is directed to deposit the
             award amount of Rs.30,27,000/- (less the amount already deposited if any)
             together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim
             _________                                                            
             Page 5 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
             petition till the date of deposit to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.528 of 2021 on
             the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal /Principal District Court, Karur,
             within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
             Judgment.                                                            
                     12.On such deposit being made, the respondents 1, 3 and      
             4/claimants are permitted to withdraw their shares along with interest and
             costs as apportioned by the Tribunal, after adjusting the amount, if any
             already withdrawn, by filing necessary application before the Tribunal. As
             the second respondent/claimant is a minor, the Tribunal shall deposit the
             share of the minor claimant in a Fixed Deposit in any one of the     
             Nationalized Banks, till the minor claimant attains majority. The guardian of
             the minor claimant is permitted to withdraw the interest accrued thereon
             once in three months directly from the bank. No costs.               
                                                               31.12.2024         
             NCC:Yes/No                                                           
             Index:Yes/No                                                         
             Internet::Yes/No                                                     
             _________                                                            
             Page 6 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
             To                                                                   
             1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,                               
              Principal District Court,                                           
              Karur.                                                              
             _________                                                            
             Page 7 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                                                 

                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.770 of 2023  
                                                       R. KALAIMATHI  ,J .        
                                                                      Ns          
                                               C.M.A(MD)No.770   of 2023          
                                                              31.12.2024          
             _________                                                            
             Page 8 of 8                                                          
  https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis