Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Ms S R Solar Energy Park vs. Central Bank of India

Decided on 30 September 2024• Citation: WPMS/2456/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                               2024:UHC:7220        
                      HIGH  COURT    OF  UTTARAKHAND      AT  NAINITAL              
                            Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 2456 of 2024             
                    M/s S. R. Solar Energy Park                 --Petitioner        
                                            Versus                                  
                    Central Bank of India and Another        --Respondents          
                    Presence:-                                                      
                         Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel for petitioner-firm,   
                         appeared through video conferencing.                       
                         Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.1-Bank,
                         appeared through video conferencing.                       
                    Hon’ble Pankaj  Purohit, J. (Oral)                              
                              Heard learned  counsel for the parties.               
                    2.        A  loan  amounting    to  Rs.3,60,00,000/-            
                    (Rupees  Three Crore Sixty Lakhs  only) was  issued in          
                    favour of the petitioner-firm. It could not repay  the          
                    aforesaid  loan,  therefore,  on   30.04.2018,   loan           
                    amount  was  rendered  NPA  against the petitioner. On          
                    the  request  made    by  the  petitioner, One   Time           
                    Settlement  (OTS) was  conducted  between  the parties          
                    and  in  One  Time   Settlement,  petitioner-firm was           
                    directed  to  pay  Rs.1,59,55,600/-    as  One   Time           
                    Settlement. As OTS,  the petitioner-firm has deposited          
                    Rs.81,00,000/-,  but rest of the payment could not be           
                    made   by the petitioner-firm, therefore, respondent-           
                    Bank  has  initiated the recovery proceedings against           
                    the  petitioner-firm  for Rs.  94,63,000/-(including            
                    interest).                                                      
                    3.        Now, the petitioner is before this Court, by          
                    filing the  present  writ  petition, challenging   the          
                    aforesaid recovery proceeding.                                  
                    4.        Vide  order   dated   18.09.2024,   learned           
                    counsel   for the   petitioner was   asked   to  seek           
                    instruction as to whether   the petitioner is ready to          
                    deposit the balance of the amount  of OTS or not.               
                                               1                                    

                                                               2024:UHC:7220        
                    5.        Today,  learned counsel   for the petitioner          
                    submitted  that the petitioner-firm is ready to deposit         
                    the balance  amount   of One  Time  Settlement  (OTS),          
                    but, for  that purpose,  petitioner-firm needs   some           
                    time  and   that   may   be  accommodated      to  the          
                    petitioner-firm.                                                
                    6.        Learned  counsel  for the respondent  No.1-           
                    Bank  has  no objection, if some time  is given to the          
                    petitioner-firm.                                                
                    7.        Having  considered  the submissions   made            
                    by  of the  parties  and  having   gone  through   the          
                    pleadings, this  Court  is of the  view that  ends  of          
                    justice would be met,  if petitioner-firm is granted 03         
                    months’  time to deposit the balance amount.                    
                    8.        In this view of the matter, the writ petition         
                    is disposed  of with a direction to petitioner-firm to          
                    deposit  the   balance  amount    of  Rs.94,63,000/-            
                    (including interest) to  the respondent   No.1-Bank,            
                    within a period of three months from  today. However,           
                    a sum  of Rs.40,00,000/-  (Rs. Forty Lakhs only) shall          
                    be deposited  by  the petitioner-firm within 30  days’          
                    from today  and the  rest of amount  will be deposited          
                    as  half in two  installments  thereafter within  two           
                    months.  Failing  which, the  petitioner-firm will not          
                    avail the benefit of this order.                                
                                                   (Pankaj  Purohit,  J.)           
                                                        30.09.2024                  
                    PN                                                              
                    PREETI                                                          
                    NEGI DDU27sBD e .6 D T iN a 5 r g c T tBi . : 4 a i 1 e A tc 0l . : 6 a 2 N =R F2 4 l 0 l 9 IA u 0 y 3 N = 2m K 2 2 s, 2 6 4 H f io b9 g 36 . A= 0 eD ca n 9 NH 7 ra e 5= . 5b D 3 Id B G 2 a, 0 F , b B 8 H p 01 y A co 87 C 4 5s P D: O 7t 1 3 R a 9 6 8 1 UE l 5 5C : 7 ER 19 5 1o TT 4A 8 8 I d 1 O +C N 9e1 0,3 F = E 8 c5 B G 2 U n 0 ' 3 3 6 IT a = C 0 35 T P3 ' 0 A 8 RC0d R EB17 A E ,3 4 T K sC 7 I t H C= N 8 A CUf E a N AG Td D TEI b 8A , e 1 o R3 F u A8 A = K3 E H H3 0 1 I A G 6 bN4 H a 4Dc C 9 5, 8 O 5 4 c U 8 7 R 3 8 T A b O 8 5 3 f F 9 D f0 8 2 4
                                               2