Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Ramesh Petwal vs. State of Uttarakhand Through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat

Decided on 30 September 2024• Citation: WPSS/3412/2017• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                  2024:UHC:7241   
                        Of f i ce N o t es,                                       
                       r ep o r t s, o r d er s                                   
                       o r p r o ceed i n g s                                     
            SL.                                                                   
                 Dat e  o r d i r ect i o n s COURT’ S OR JUDGE’ S ORDERS         
            N o .                                                                 
                       an d Reg i st r ar ’ s                                     
                         o r d er w i t h                                         
                         Si g n at u r es                                         
                                    WPSS No.3412 of 2017                          
                                    H o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.
                                         Mr . Rohit Kum ar  Gau r , Adv ocat e,   
                                    h oldin g br ief of Mr . B. M. Pin gal, Adv ocat e
                                    f or t h e pet it ioner .                     
                                         Mr . Dev esh Ghildiy al, Br ief Holder   
                                    f or t h e St at e of Ut t ar ak h an d.      
                                         Mr . Shobhit Sah ar ia, Adv ocat e f or  
                                    Teh r i Hy dr o Dev elopm en t Cor por at ion.
                                    2 .  By  m ean s of  t h is w r it pet it ion ,
                                    pet it ioner h as sou gh t t h e f ollow in g 
                                    r elief s:                                    
                                    “ ( i) I ssue w r it r ule or dir ect ion in t he nat ur e of
                                    m andam us dir ect ing t o t he r espondent THDC t o
                                    consider t he case of t he pet it ioner for appoint m ent
                                    for t he post of Execut ive Tr ainee Law in v iew of t he
                                    gover nm ent or der and r ehabilit at ion policy
                                    ( Annexur e No.1 and 2) t r eat ing him eligible along
                                    w it h all consequent ial benefit s, aft er calling t he
                                    ent ir e r ecor d                             
                                    ( ii) I ssue w r it r ule or dir ect ion appr opr iat e in nat ur e
                                    by aw ar ding suit able com pensat ion in t une of Rs.
                                    Ten Lacs t o t he pet it ioner for t he m alicious and
                                    ar bit r ar y act of t he r espondent THDC in r espect of
                                    cr eat ing undue confusion about t he eligibilit y of t he
                                    pet it ioner or such am ount w hich t his Hon’ble Cour t
                                    m ay quant ify for m alicious and ar bit r ar y act of t he
                                    r espondent THDC and dir ect t o r ecover t he sam e
                                    fr om t he er r ing officer .”                
                                    3 .  Accor din g t o pet it ioner , he applied
                                    f or t h e post of Ex ecu t iv e Tr ain ee, Law ,
                                    pu r su an t t o an adv er t isem en t issu ed by
                                    Teh r i Hy dr o Dev elopm en t Cor por at ion, in
                                    t h e y ear 2 0 1 5 . Since pet it ion er w as n ot
                                    called f or in t er v iew , t h er ef or e, h e h as
                                    appr oached   t his  Cou r t  w it h t h e    
                                    con t en t ion t h at he belon gs t o ar ea, w hich
                                    w as su bm er ged on accou n t of T. H. D. C. 
                                    Pr oj ect , t h er ef or e, h e h ad a pr ef er en t ial

                                                                  2024:UHC:7241   
                                    r igh t of appoin t m en t as  Ex ecu t iv e  
                                    Tr ainee Law , t h er ef or e, a m an dam u s be
                                    issu ed t o t h e em ploy er t o appoin t h im .
                                    4 .  A cou n t er af fidav it h as been filed on
                                    beh alf of T. H. D. C. Par agr aph n o. 9 of t h e
                                    said cou n t er af fidav it is ex t r act ed below :
                                    “ 9 . That t he cont ent s of t he par agr aph no. 11 of t he
                                    w r it pet it ion ar e false and hence denied in light of
                                    t he subm issions and clar ificat ions m ade in t he
                                    pr eceding par agr aphs of t he inst ant affidavit . I t is
                                    fur t her subm it t ed t hat shor t list ing of t he candidat es
                                    for t he said r ecr uit m ent w as done t hr ough CLAT All
                                    I ndia r ank against lim it ed vacancy available in t he
                                    Cor por at ion. No St at e r eser vat ion w as available and
                                    t her efor e no St at e Rank could have been  
                                    consider ed. The pet it ioner has secur ed All I ndia
                                    Rank 4678 in t he Com m on Law Adm ission Test and
                                    could not be even consider ed for shor t - list ing for
                                    int er v iew on t he basis of his m er it for 03 vacancies.
                                    I t is fur t her subm it t ed t hat t he fact of t he m at t er is
                                    t hat pet it ioner does not fulfill pr escr ibed condit ions
                                    of eligibilit y and w as not even eligible t o apply for
                                    t he post in t he 1st inst ance as he belongs t o Gener al
                                    Cat egor y and t he upper age lim it pr escr ibed for
                                    candidat es of Gener al Cat egor y w as 30 year s as on
                                    31.01.2015. Tak ing t he age r elaxat ion of 05 year s
                                    given t o candidat es of Doob Kshet r a even, pet it ioner
                                    is over aged ( as his Dat e of Bir t h is 16 June 1973) .
                                    Fur t her , t he m inim um r equir ed per cent age in t he
                                    qualify ing degr ee for t he Gener al Cat egor y
                                    candidat e w as 65% w her eas t he pet it ioner w as
                                    having less t han 60% . Therefor e, he does not fulfill
                                    t he eligibilit y cr it er ia.”               
                                    5 .  Lear n ed cou n sel appear in g  f or    
                                    T. H. D. C. su bm it s t h at applican t s, w ho
                                    applied    pu r su an t  t o   af or esaid    
                                    adv er t isem en t , w er e sh or t list ed based on
                                    t h eir per for m an ce in CLAT   L. L. M.    
                                    Ex am in at ion ; since pet it ioner ’s scor e in
                                    CLAT  L. L. M. Ex am in at ion w as less t h an
                                    t h e last can didat e, w h o w as sh or t list ed in
                                    Gener al Cat egor y , t h er ef or e, he w as n ot
                                    called f or in t er v iew . He f u r t h er su bm it s
                                    t h at , as per t h e con dit ion s m en t ion ed in
                                    t h e adv er t isem en t , a Gener al Cat egor y
                                    can didat e, w h o has scor ed less t han 6 5 %
                                    m ar k s in L. L. B. Ex am in at ion, w as n ot t o

                                                                  2024:UHC:7241   
                                    be called f or in t er v iew , w hile, pet it ioner ’s
                                    scor e  w as  less  t h an 6 0 % ; sin ce     
                                    pet it ioner belongs t o Gener al Cat egor y ,
                                    t h er efor e, h e can n ot h av e an y gr iev an ce
                                    against n ot in v it in g h im f or in t er v iew . He
                                    f u r t h er su bm it s t h at n o special    
                                    con cession  is  av ailable t o  per son s    
                                    belon gin g t o subm er ged ar ea in cu t - of f
                                    m ar k s and t hey ar e only en t it led f or 
                                    r elax at ion of u pper age t o t he ex t en t of 5
                                    y ear s. He fu r t h er su bm it s t h at pet it ioner
                                    w as ov er age  by m or e t h an 5 y ear s,   
                                    t h er efor e, ev en af t er giv in g r elax at ion
                                    av ailable t o  per son s belongin g  t o     
                                    su bm er ged ar ea, pet it ion er w as ov er age.
                                    Th u s, he su bm it s t h at t h e gr iev an ce
                                    r aised by pet it ioner , is w it h ou t any basis.
                                    6 .  Th is Cou r t finds su bst an ce in t h e
                                    su bm ission  m ade    on    behalf   of      
                                    r espon den t - T. H. D. C. Sin ce pet it ion er h ad
                                    cr ossed t h e u pper age lim it an d ev en   
                                    af t er gr an t of r elax at ion of 5 y ear s 
                                    av ailable t o  per son s belongin g  t o     
                                    su bm er ged ar ea, h e w as n ot com in g    
                                    w it hin t he age lim it pr escr ibed f or t he
                                    post in quest ion, t her efor e, n ot in v it in g
                                    h im f or in t er v iew by T. H. D. C. , can n ot be
                                    f au lt ed. Th e dir ect ion sou gh t by      
                                    pet it ioner t o appoin t him as Ex ecu t iv e
                                    Tr ainee Law , cann ot be issu ed.            
                                    7 .  Accor din gly , t he w r it pet it ion fails
                                    an d is dism issed.                           
                                                    ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.)
                                                             30.09.2024           
                                    Arpan                                         
                                    ARPAN                                         
                                            Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL     
                                            DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF
                                            UTTARAKHAND,                          
                                            2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb7393
                                    JAISWAL 398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
                                            serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB98744635
                                            1E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL
                                            Date: 2024.10.01 10:53:59 +05'30'