Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Pramod Kumar Sharma vs. Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority Haridwar

Decided on 25 October 2024• Citation: WPMS/2952/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                  2024:UHC:8047   
                        Of f i ce N o t es,                                       
                       r ep o r t s, o r d er s                                   
                       o r p r o ceed i n g s                                     
            SL.                                                                   
                 Dat e  o r d i r ect i o n s COURT’ S OR JUDGE’ S ORDERS         
            N o .                                                                 
                       an d Reg i st r ar ’ s                                     
                         o r d er w i t h                                         
                         Si g n at u r es                                         
                                    WPMS No.2952 of 2024                          
                                    H o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , A .C.J.
                                         Mr .  Raj en dr a Ar y a, Adv ocat e,    
                                    h oldin g br ief of Mr .  Neer aj  Gar g,     
                                    Adv ocat e f or t h e pet it ioner .          
                                         Mr . Lalit Miglani, Adv ocat e f or t h e
                                    r espon den t s.                              
                                    2 .  Again st t h e dem olit ion or der passed
                                    against t he pet it ioner , he h as pr ef er r ed
                                    an  Appeal,  w hich  is pen din g bef or e    
                                    Ch air m an,     Har idw ar     Roor k ee     
                                    Dev elopm en t Aut h or it y an d is n um ber ed
                                    as Appeal No. 1 of 2 0 2 4 - 2 5 .            
                                    3 .  I t is con t en ded by t h e pet it ion er
                                    t h at since n o in t er im or der has been   
                                    passed  in t h at Appeal, t h er ef or e, t h r eat
                                    of dem olit ion of h is building is loom in g 
                                    lar ge ov er his h ead, t her ef or e, h e h as
                                    sou gh t a  dir ect ion t o t he Appellat e   
                                    Au t h or it y t o decide  t h e Appeal,      
                                    ex pedit iou sly .                            
                                    4 .  Lear n ed   coun sel     f or   t h e    
                                    r espon den t s, h ow ev er , su bm it s t h at t h e
                                    Appeal filed by pet it ion er is w it h delay of
                                    1 5 day s  an d h is Delay  Condon at ion     
                                    Applicat ion is y et t o be con sider ed an d 
                                    Appeal  can be  h ear d an d decided only     
                                    w h en delay  is con don ed. He   f u r t her 
                                    su bm it s t h at in t er im r elief applicat ion can
                                    also be   con sider ed by t h e Appellat e    
                                    Au t h or it y , on ce delay is con don ed. He
                                    f u r t h er su bm it s t h at t h e n ex t dat e f ix ed
                                    bef or e t he  Appellat e Au t hor it y , is  
                                    1 1 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 4 .                         
                                    5 .  Since t h e m at t er is alr eady fix ed f or

                                                                  2024:UHC:8047   
                                    1 1 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 4 bef or e t he Appellat e  
                                    Au t h or it y , t h er efor e, t he w r it pet it ion is
                                    disposed   of   w it h a   dir ect ion t o    
                                    Com m issioner  t o  decide  pet it ioner ’s  
                                    applicat ion f or con don at ion of delay on  
                                    t h e n ex t dat e f ix ed. I f t h e Appellat e
                                    Au t h or it y deem s it appr opr iat e t o   
                                    con done t h e delay , t h en t he Appellat e 
                                    Au t h or it y sh all also consider pet it ioner ’s
                                    in t er im r elief applicat ion , on t he sam e
                                    day .                                         
                                    6 .  Till 1 1 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 4 , con st r u ct ion r aised
                                    by pet it ioner , shall n ot be dem olish ed. 
                                                ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , A . C. J. )
                                                             25.10.2024           
                                    Arpan                                         
                                            Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL     
                                            DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF             
                                    ARPAN                                         
                                            UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF         
                                            UTTARAKHAND,                          
                                            2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c2396   
                                            4c0485365445e3a20dddb7393398f9fe45    
                                            ba3e, postalCode=263001,              
                                    JAISWAL                                       
                                            st=UTTARAKHAND,                       
                                            serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215     
                                            D68D9D454C5109CB987446351E4DF04       
                                            AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL       
                                            Date: 2024.10.25 14:00:05 +05'30'     

                                                                  2024:UHC:8047