Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

State of Uttarakhand vs. Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax

Decided on 24 May 2024• Citation: WPMS/1350/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                         Office Notes,                                            
                       reports, orders or                                         
                        proceedings or                                            
          No    Date                          COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS          
                        directions and                                            
                       Registrar’s order                                          
                        with Signatures                                           
                                    WPMS No.1350 of 2024                          
                                    H o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.
                                         Mr . Mohit Maulek h i, Br ief Holder f or
                                    t h e St at e of Ut t ar ak h an d/ pet it ioner .
                                         Ms. Sak shi Sin gh, Adv ocat e, holdin g 
                                    br ief of Mr . Shobhit Sah ar ia, Adv ocat e  
                                    f or t h e r espon den t s.                   
                                    2 .  Th is w r it pet it ion is dir ect ed again st
                                    t h e or der dat ed 0 3 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 3 passed by
                                    r espon den t n o. 3 , w h er eby G. S. T.    
                                    r egist r at ion of t h e pet it ion er h as been
                                    can celled on t h e gr ou n d of n on - f ilin g of
                                    G. S. T. r et u r ns f or six consecu t iv e  
                                    m on t h s. Th e ex plan at ion of f er ed by 
                                    pet it ioner is t h at , due t o com m un icat ion
                                    gap   bet w een pet it ioner and h is t ax    
                                    con sult an t , t he G. S. T. r et u r ns cou ld n ot
                                    be filled.                                    
                                    3 .  Lear n ed cou nsel f or t h e pet it ion er
                                    r elies  upon    a    j u dgm ent  dat ed     
                                    0 4 . 0 4 . 2 0 2 4 r ender ed by t his Cou r t in
                                    WPMS   No. 8 5 0 of 2 0 2 3 an d h e su bm it s
                                    t h at pr esen t w r it pet it ion m ay be decided
                                    in t er m s of t h e said j udgm en t .       
                                    4 .  Lear n ed    coun sel    f or   t h e    
                                    r espon den t s f air ly su bm it s t h at sin ce t he
                                    con t r ov er sy in v olv ed in t his w r it pet it ion
                                    is  iden t ical t o t h e on e decided in     
                                    af or esaid w r it pet it ion, t h er ef or e, she
                                    h as n o obj ect ion, if t his w r it pet it ion is
                                    decided  in  t er m s of j u dgm ent dat ed   
                                    0 4 . 0 4 . 2 0 2 4 r en der ed in WPMS No. 8 5 0 of
                                    2 0 2 3 .                                     

                                    5 .  I n v iew of con sen su s bet w een t h e
                                    par t ies t h at m at t er is cov er ed by t h e
                                    or der passed in Wr it Pet it ion No. 4 2 4 of
                                    2 0 2 4 ( M/ S) , pr esen t w r it pet it ion is also
                                    decided  in  t er m s of t he said or der .   
                                    Pet it ion er sh all be at liber t y t o m ov e an
                                    applicat ion for r ev ocat ion of cancellat ion
                                    or der u n der Sect ion 3 0 of Cen t r al GST 
                                    Act ,  w it hin t w o w eek s. Wit h  his     
                                    applicat ion, pet it ioner sh all also f u r nish
                                    all t he GST r et u r n s w h ich he failed t o
                                    su bm it an d he  w ill also deposit t he     
                                    ou t st an din g dues of Goods an d Ser v ice 
                                    Tax w it h his applicat ion. I f he m ak es t he
                                    applicat ion w it hin st ipulat ed t im e, t he
                                    com pet en t aut h or it y sh all con sider   
                                    pet it ioner ’s applicat ion an d   pass      
                                    appr opr iat e or der , as per law , w it h in f ou r
                                    w eek s t h er eaf t er .                     
                                                    ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.)
                                                             24.05.2024           
                                    Arpan