Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. June

Ramkali Devi vs. State of Uttarakhand

Decided on 28 June 2024• Citation: WPMS/1754/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                         Office Notes,                                            
                       reports, orders or                                         
                        proceedings or                                            
          No    Date                          COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS          
                        directions and                                            
                       Registrar’s order                                          
                        with Signatures                                           
                                    WPMS No.1732 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1734 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1744 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1745 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1746 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1753 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1754 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1757 of 2024                          
                                    WPMS No.1759 of 2024                          
                                    H o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.
                                         Mr . B. S. Kor an ga, Adv ocat e f or t h e
                                    pet it ioner .                                
                                         Mr . Anil Kum ar Dabr al, Addit ion al   
                                    C. S. C. and Mr . Su y ash Pan t , St an din g
                                    Cou n sel f or t he St at e of Ut t ar ak h an d.
                                         Mr . Rahul   Consu l, Adv ocat e f or    
                                    Sachiv  Bh av an Ev am  An y a San n ir m an  
                                    Kar m ak ar Kaly an Boar d, Deh r adun .      
                                    2 .  Since com m on qu est ion s of law an d  
                                    f act ar e in v olv ed in t h ese w r it pet it ion s,
                                    t h er efor e t h ey w er e h ear d t oget h er and
                                    ar e  being   decided   by   a  com m on      
                                    j u dgm en t . How ev er , f or t he sak e of 
                                    br ev it y , f act s of Wr it Pet it ion ( M/ S)
                                    No. 1 7 3 2 of 20 2 4 alon e  ar e being      
                                    con sider ed an d discu ssed.                 
                                    3 .  By  m ean s  of t h is w r it pet it ion ,
                                    pet it ioner h as sou gh t t h e f ollow ing r elief :
                                    “ i) To issue a w r it or der and dir ect ion in t he nat ur e
                                    of Mandam us dir ect ing and com m anding t he
                                    Respondent s t o consider t he case of t he pet it ioner
                                    for r eleasing Rs.3,00, 000/ - in favor of t he pet it ioner
                                    under t he Building and ot her const r uct ion w or km en
                                    ( Regulat ion of em ploym ent and condit ions of
                                    ser vice) schem e w it hout any t echnical obj ect ion.”
                                    4 .  Accor din g t o pet it ioner , she is    

                                    depen den t of Sh r i San j u Ku m ar , w ho  
                                    w as r egist er ed as Con st r u ct ion Wor k er
                                    u n der Buildin g an d Ot h er Con st r u ct ion
                                    Wor k er s ( Regulat ion of Em ploy m en t an d
                                    Con dit ion s of Ser v ice) Act , 1 99 6 , w h o
                                    died on  1 4 . 0 2 . 20 2 3 . Pet it ion er applied
                                    f or deat h claim av ailable t o depen den t s
                                    of    Con st r u ct ion Wor k er s u n der    
                                    Ut t ar ak h an d Bu ildin g and   Ot h er    
                                    Con st r uct ion Wor k er s ( Regulat ion of  
                                    Em ploy m en t and Con dit ions of Ser v ice) 
                                    Ru les, 2 0 0 5 , as am en ded f r om t im e- t o-
                                    t im e. As per t h e said Ru les, depen den t s
                                    of Con st r uct ion Wor k er s ar e en t it led t o
                                                                   - . Sin ce     
                                    death  claim  upto  ₹3,00,000/                
                                    decision  h as not  been  t ak en on t h e    
                                    applicat ion   m ade    by     pet it ioner , 
                                    t h er efor e, sh e h as appr oached t his    
                                    Cou r t .                                     
                                    5 .  Lear n ed cou nsel f or t h e pet it ion er
                                    su bm it s t h at dat e of m ak in g applicat ion
                                    f or deat h claim  by  t h e pet it ion er is 
                                    2 7 . 0 9 . 2 0 2 3 . Thu s, h e su bm it s t h at t he
                                    applicat ion w as   m ade   w it hin t im e   
                                    st ipulat ed for t h e pu r pose.             
                                    6 .  Mr . Rah ul Con su l, Adv ocat e r efer s
                                    t o Rule 2 7 9 of t he af or esaid Rules, w hich
                                    r eads as un der :                            
                                    “ 2 7 9 . A p p l i ca t i o n f o r A s s i s t a n ce o n D e a t h .- ( 1)
                                    A nom inee w ho is ent it led t o Deat h Assist ance under
                                    t his r ule shall subm it t o t he Secr et ar y or any ot her
                                    officer aut hor ised by him an applicat ion in For m No.
                                    XXXVI I . A cer t ificat e r egar ding t he deat h/ accident
                                    deat h issued by a Gover nm ent doct or shall be
                                    pr oduced along w it h t he applicat ion and ot her
                                    docum ent s specified by t he Boar d.         
                                    ( 2) The Secr et ar y or t he officer aut hor ised by him
                                    m ay on r eceipt of t he applicat ion conduct an enquir y
                                    w it h r egar d t o t he eligibilit y of t he applicant .
                                    ( 3) I f t he Secr et ar y or t he officer aut hor ised by him
                                    is sat isfied t hat t he per son w ho has applied for
                                    financial assist ance is ent it led for such assist ance he

                                    m ay sanct ion t he am ount .                 
                                    ( 4) The sanct ioning aut hor it y shall m aint ain a
                                    r egist er for t his pur pose in For m No. XXXVI I I .
                                    ( 5) A per son aggr iev ed by any decision t aken under
                                    sub- r ule ( 3) m ay file an appeal befor e t he Boar d
                                    w it hin sixt y days fr om t he dat e of r eceipt of t he
                                    or der under t hat sub- r ule and t he decision of t he
                                    Boar d t her eon shall be final.”             
                                    7 .  Mr . Rah ul Consul, Adv ocat e subm it s 
                                    t h at deat h claim can be r eleased only     
                                    af t er due enquir y .                        
                                    8 .  Since    applicat ion   m ade    by      
                                    pet it ioner is pending f or last m or e t h an
                                    1 0 m on t h s, t her ef or e, t he w r it pet it ion s
                                    ar e disposed   of w it h a dir ect ion t o   
                                    r espon den t n o. 2 t o t ak e decision on   
                                    pet it ioner ’s applicat ion f or deat h claim
                                    w it hin a per iod of f ou r m on t hs’ f r om t he
                                    dat e of pr odu ct ion of cer t ified copy of 
                                    t h is or der .                               
                                                    ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.)
                                                             28.06.2024           
                                    Arpan