HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 520 of 2024
Sanjay Kumar ...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and another ...Respondents
Present:-
Mr. Bharat Chaudhary, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. M.A. Khan, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.
130 of 2024, under Sections 380, 411, 457 IPC, Police Station
Doiwala, District Dehradun.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the record.
3. According to the FIR, a theft was committed in the
house of the informant in the intervening night of 13-
14.04.2024.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit
that it is a false case; the applicant has been falsely
implicated; the co-accused has named him.
5. State was required to file objection, but it has not
been filed.
6. Learned State counsel would submit that the
investigation is still underway.
2
7. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court
is of the view that this is a case fit for anticipatory bail.
8. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.
9. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be
enlarged on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing a
personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to
the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to
it, the applicant shall also comply with the following
conditions:
(i) The applicant shall co-operate with the
investigation.
(ii) The applicant shall not approach any witness in
any manner, whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without
prior permission of the concerned court.
(iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the
AO. The passport may only be returned by the
order of the court concerned. In case, the applicant
does not have passport, he shall give an
undertaking to that effect to the AO.
(v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i),
(ii) & (iii) above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
31.07.2024
Jitendra