Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Vivek Kumar Saxena vs. State of Uttarakhand

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: BA1/135/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                      Office Notes,                                               
                      reports, orders                                             
                      or proceedings                                              
        SL.                                                                       
              Date    or directions          COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS           
        No                                                                        
                      and Registrar’s                                             
                       order with                                                 
                       Signatures                                                 
            3 1 .0 1 .2 0 2 4   BA1 No. 135 of 2024                               
                                Sr i Ra k e s h Th a p l i y a l , J.             
                                1.   Mr . Azm een Sheikh, lear ned counsel holding br ief of
                                Mr . Naveen Singh Bisht , lear ned counsel for t he applicant .
                                2.   Mr . V.K. Gem ini, lear ned Deput y Advocat e Gener al
                                assist ed by Mr . Sachin Shar m a, lear ned Br ief Holder for t he
                                St at e- r espondent .                            
                                3.   The present applicant is seeking bail in r elat ion t o FI R
                                No.05 of 2024, for t he offence punishable under Sect ion
                                8/ 21 of t he Nar cot ic Dr ugs and Psychot r opic Subst ance Act ,
                                1985, P.S. Tr ansit Cam p, Dist r ict Udham Singh Nagar .
                                4.   Lear ned counsel for t he applicant subm it s t hat t he
                                alleged cont r aband of Sm ack, w hich is show n t o be
                                r ecover ed fr om t he pr esent applicant , is below t he
                                com m er cial quant it y, i.e. 26.20 gr am . I t is also subm it t ed
                                t hat t her e is no com pliance of Sect ion 50 of t he NDPS Act ,
                                and fur t her m or e, t her e is no independent w it ness, and in
                                fact , t he applicant is r unning a m edical st or e, and he has
                                been falsely im plicat ed. I n Par agr aph No.11 of t he affidav it ,
                                filed in suppor t of t he inst ant bail applicat ion, it is
                                cont ended t hat t her e is no pr ev ious cr im inal hist or y of t he
                                pr esent applicant , and he is languishing in j ail since
                                04.01.2024.                                       
                                5.   I t is undisput ed fact t hat t he invest igat ion is st ill
                                going on, and as cont ended in Par agr aph No.11 of t he
                                affidav it filed in suppor t of t he bail applicat ion t hat t he
                                pr esent applicant has no cr im inal hist or y.   
                                6.   Mr . Gem ini, on inst r uct ions, fair ly subm it s t hat t he
                                alleged r ecover y of cont r aband of Sm ack is below t he
                                com m er cial quant it y.                         
                                7.   Aft er hear ing t he ar gum ent s of lear ned counsel for

                                t he applicant , and w it hout expr essing any opinion on t he
                                m er it s of t he case, t his Cour t is of t he v iew t hat it is a fit
                                case for gr ant of bail.                          
                                8.   The bail applicat ion is allow ed.           
                                9.   Let t he applicant Vivek Kum ar Saxena be r eleased on
                                bail on his execut ing a per son bond and fur nishing t w o
                                r eliable sur et ies of t he like am ount t o t he sat isfact ion of t he
                                cour t concer ned w it h t he follow ing condit ions:
                                    i) Applicant shall at t end t he Trial Court regularly and he
                                    shall not seek any unnecessary adj ournm ent .
                                    ii) Applicant shall not direct ly or indirect ly m ake any
                                    inducem ent , t hr eat or prom ise t o any per son acquaint ed
                                    wit h t he fact s of t his case.              
                                    iii) Applicant shall not leav e t he count ry wit hout previous
                                    perm ission of t he Trial Court .             
                                    iv) I n case t he applicant is found t o be inv olved in fut ure
                                    in any ot her sim ilar case, or m isuses or violat es any of
                                    t he condit ions im posed on him while grant ing bail, t he
                                    prosecut ion is fr ee t o m ove an applicat ion for cancellat ion
                                    of bail.                                      
                                                            ( Ra k e s h Th a p l i y a l , J.)
                                                                V a ca t i o n Ju d g e
                                                                 3 1 .0 1 .2 0 2 4
                                9                                                 
                                NI SHANT