HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Anticipatory Bail Application No.674 of 2023
Masaarur Ahamad ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant appeared
through video conferencing.
Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.561
of 2022 dated 19.06.2022, under Sections 406, 420, 323,
504, 506 IPC, Police Station Manglaur, District Haridwar.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would
submit that the co-accused having similar role had
already been granted anticipatory bail.
4. Learned State counsel seeks some time to get
instructions and thereafter, he would submit that the
co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail
in ABA No.165 of 2022.
2
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view
that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be
granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail
application deserves to be allowed.
6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall
be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond
with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the
satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned.
In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the
following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not approach any witness
in any manner, whatsoever.
(ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation.
(iii) The applicant shall not leave the country
without prior permission of the concerned
court.
(iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with
the AO. The passport may only be returned by
the order of the court concerned. In case, if the
applicant does not have passport, he shall give
an undertaking to that effect to the AO.
3
(iv) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on
(i), (ii) & (iii) above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
29.02.2024
Sanjay