Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. February

Shiv Lal Arya vs. State of Uttarakhand

Decided on 29 February 2024• Citation: WPSS/285/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                       Office Notes, reports,                                     
                       orders or proceedings                                      
          1SL.                                                                    
                Date    or directions and      COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS         
          No                                                                      
                       Registrar’s order with                                     
                          Signatures                                              
                                    WPSS No.285 of 2024                           
                                    Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.                    
                                    1.   Mr.  M.C.  Upadhyay, learned counsel,    
                                    holding brief of Mr. A.K. Saklani, learned counsel
                                    for the petitioner.                           
                                    2.   Mr. Ramesh  Chandra Joshi, learned Brief 
                                    Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.         
                                    3.   The  writ petition has been filed by the 
                                    petitioner commanding  and   directing the    
                                    respondent no.1/Secretary, Revenue Department,
                                    Government of Uttarakhand, to decide the statutory
                                    revision of the petitioner within a stipulated period.
                                    4.   It is further submitted by the learned counsel
                                    for the petitioner that the petitioner was inflicted
                                    with the major penalty after conclusion of the
                                    departmental proceedings, and appeal preferred
                                    which was  again dismissed, and presently the 
                                    revision is pending with the Secretary, Revenue
                                    Department, Government of Uttarakhand, as stated
                                    above.                                        
                                    5.   On the last date, learned counsel for the State
                                    was  directed to seek instructions as to what 
                                    happened in the said revision, which is statutory in
                                    nature, and why it has not been decided so far.
                                    6.   Learned counsel for the State on instructions
                                    submitted that the respondent no.1 undertakes to
                                    decide the same within a period of one month. 
                                    7.   The writ petition is finally disposed of, on

                                    the said submissions made by the learned counsel
                                    for the respondent – State                    
                                                           (Pankaj Purohit, J.)   
                                                              29.02.2024          
                                    NR