HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.1636 of 2024
Iliyas ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Vikas Anand and Ms. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate for
the applicant.
Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR
No.95 of 2024, dated 17.03.2024, under Sections 363,
376, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station
ITI, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his
release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would
submit that the victim has not supported the prosecution
case; she has turned hostile; there is no other evidence.
Learned counsel would submit that there is no forensic
evidence, as well.
2
4. This facts are admitted by the learned State
counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view
that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to
be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his
executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable
sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of
the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
30.08.2024
Sanjay