Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Uttarakhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. April

Zubair Ahmad vs. Meharban Singh Koranga

Decided on 30 April 2024• Citation: CLCON/83/2024• High Court of Uttarakhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                       Office Notes, reports,                                     
                       orders or proceedings                                      
          1SL.                                                                    
                Date    or directions and      COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS         
          No                                                                      
                       Registrar’s order with                                     
                          Signatures                                              
                                    CLCON  No.83 of 2024                          
                                    Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.                    
                                    1.   Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for 
                                    the petitioner and Mr. Zubir Ahmad petitioner in
                                    person are present.                           
                                    2.   Since contempt petition is premature as  
                                    the order, against which, contempt has been   
                                    filed was passed on 22.02.2024.               
                                    4.   Respondents  are directed to do  the     
                                    needful within reasonable time under law.     
                                    Reasonable time would amount a detail period  
                                    of  three months  for respondents to take     
                                    decision.                                     
                                    5.   In view  of the matter, the contempt     
                                    petition is premature.                        
                                    6.   Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
                                    that she wants to withdraw this writ petition.
                                    7.   Permission is granted.                   
                                    8.   The  contempt petition is dismissed as   
                                    withdrawn enabling her to file a fresh as and 
                                    when cause of action arises.                  
                                                        (Pankaj  Purohit, J.)     
                                                            30.04.2024            
                                    Arti