1 2
Page of
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
BA No.63 of 2024
Yeakub Ali on behalf of accused person Esha Ali
---Appellant(s)
Versus
The State of Tripura
----Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Lodh, Adv.
Mr. K. Roy, Adv.
Mr. S. Majumder, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, P.P.
Mr. S. Ghosh, Addl. P.P.
JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
HON’BLE MR.
Order
18/10/2024
Learned counsel Mr. S. Lodh along with Mr. K. Roy, Learned
counsel and Mr. S. Majumder, Learned counsel is present for the
appellant-petitioner and Mr. Raju Datta, Learned P.P and Mr. S.
Ghosh, Learned Addl. P.P. is present for the State.
This bail application is filed under Section 483(1)(a) of BNSS
for release of accused on bail who is in custody in connection with
NCC PS FIR No.071 dated 21.08.2024 under Section
61(2),249,111,143 of BNS, 2023.
Heard both the sides at length.
Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn the attention of
the court that the accused is in custody with effect from
22.08.2024 and the statutory period is likely to expire soon. So he
urged for releasing the accused on bail on any condition.
Learned P.P. and Learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand
opposed the bail application and submitted that in absence of
Case Diary there is no scope to release the accused on bail at this
stage.
Considered.
2 2
Page of
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case at this
stage this court is not inclined to consider the bail application of
the accused person.
Hence, the application is accordingly stands dismissed.
However, considering the period of detention of the accused
in custody the accused shall be at liberty to approach to the
concerned court for bail and the concerned court shall deal the
matter in accordance with law.
With this observation this case is disposed of.
A copy of this order be supplied to the Learned counsel Mr.
S. Lodh appearing for the appellant.
JUDGE
Digitally signed by
MOUMITA
MOUMITA DATTA
Date: 2024.10.18 18:11:12
DATTA
+05'30'
Moumita