Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Tripura/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Sri Rajib Deb vs. the State of Tripura

Decided on 08 October 2024• Citation: AB/52/2024• High Court of Tripura
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          1  3                                      
                                      Page of                                       
                              HIGH COURT   OF TRIPURA                               
                                     AGARTALA                                       
                                    AB  52 of 2024                                  
               Sri Rajib Deb                                                        
               Son of Sri Narayan Deb of Shanti Palli, Rabindranagar,               
               P.S-Sonamura, Dist-Sepahijala, Tripura.                              
                                                         Accused-Applicant(s)       
                                                     ...…                           
                              Versus                                                
               The State of Tripura                                                 
                                                              -Respondent(s)        
                                                            ….                      
               For the Applicant(s)     :    Mr. Subrata Sarkar, Sr. Advocate       
                                             Mr. K. D. Singha, Advocate             
               For the Respondent(s)   :     Mr. Raju Datta, PP                     
                                             Mr. S. Ghosh, Addl. PP                 
                         HON’BLE   MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM   LODH                       
                                        Order                                       
            08/10/2024                                                              
                    This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for
               granting pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant who is in serious  
               apprehension that he may be arrested by the police in connection with
               Sonamura PS case No.2024 SNM 072 registered under Sections 85/80/49 of
               the BNS Act, 2023.                                                   
                    Heard Mr. Subrata Sarkar, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K.
               D. Singha, learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant. Also heard
               Raju Datta, learned PP appearing for the State-respondent.           
                    The prosecution story is that after marriage, the accused-applicant
               along with other in-laws were demanding so many articles including a cash
               amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh) for purchasing a bike from the
               daughter of the complainant. It is stated in the FIR that the complainant, i.e.
               the mother of the deceased, had paid Rs.1.00 lakh to the accused person due

                                          2  3                                      
                                      Page of                                       
               to his constant pressure and mental torcher upon her daughter, but inspite of
               the amount, the demand from the accused person did not stop. The     
               complainant had received information in the intervening night of 27.07.2024
               and 28.07.2024 at about 03.00 hours that her daughter committed suicide by
               consuming poison and died at the night of 27.07.2024. Thereafter, the
               complainant lodged a complaint against the accused-husband, Sri Rajib Deb.
                    Mr.  Sarkar, learned senior counsel appearing for the accused-  
               applicant has submitted that the accused-applicant was totally innocent and
               is falsely implicated in the case. According to learned senior counsel, it is a
               case of simple suicide. After consuming poison, the deceased was stranding
               like anything when the husband told her what had happened to her. The
               deceased wife had disclosed to him that she consumed poison and thereafter,
               without loss of time the husband-accused had taken her to Melaghar   
               Hospital. Considering her seriousness, she was thereafter shifted to G.B.P.
               Hospital, Agartala where she died.                                   
                    I have perused the case diary. It is an admitted fact that the deceased
               was taken to Melaghar Hospital where she was given some preliminary  
               treatment and thereafter she was shifted to G.B.P. Hospital, Agartala. From
               the case diary, it is revealed that the deceased did not disclose anything
               about the involvement of the accused-applicant in poisoning her, though she
               was conscious when she was taken to Melaghar Hospital. The complaint was
               lodged on 30.07.2024, i.e. after three days of the death of the deceased.
               From the surathal report, it comes to fore that there was no sign of any injury
               on the person of the deceased. Post-mortem report however reveals that she
               consumed poison and there was no injury on her person.               

                                          3  3                                      
                                      Page of                                       
                    In the light of above circumstances, in my opinion, this is a fit case
               for granting anticipatory bail in favour of the accused-applicant.   
                    Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of arrest, the accused-
               applicant, namely Sri Rajib Deb shall be released on bail on his furnishing a
               bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety of like
               amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. However, it is directed
               that the accused-applicant, i.e. Sri Rajib Deb shall appear before the
               Investigating Officer once in a week and he will cooperate with the process
               of investigation.                                                    
                    In terms of the above directions, the instant anticipatory bail 
               application stands allowed and disposed.                             
                                                            JUDGE                   
      Rohit                                                                         
        Digitally signed                                                            
    SANJAY                                                                          
        by SANJAY                                                                   
        GHOSH                                                                       
    GHOSH                                                                           
        Date: 2024.10.08                                                            
        17:22:42 +05'30'