Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Tripura/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Sadek Miah and Anr. vs. the State of Tripura

Decided on 31 May 2024• Citation: AB/21/2024• High Court of Tripura
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                            1                                       
                                        Page                                        
                             HIGH  COURT   OF TRIPURA                               
                                     AGARTALA                                       
                                     AB 21/2024                                     
               Sadek Miah and anr.                          ----Applicant(s)        
                                       Versus                                       
               The State of Tripura                       ----Respondent(s)         
               For Petitioner(s)   :    Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate                       
               For Respondent(s)   :    Mr. S. Ghosh, Addl. PP                      
                                        TICE  ARINDAM   LODH                        
                       HON’BLE  MR.  JUS                                            
                                       Order                                        
               31/05/2024                                                           
                   Heard  Mr. S.  Lodh, learned  counsel appearing for  the         
               accused-applicants, namely, Sadek Miah and Mithun Miah. Also         
               heard Mr. S.  Ghosh, learned Additional PP appearing for the         
               respondent-State.                                                    
                   This is an application filed under section 438 Cr.P.C. for       
               granting pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicants, who  are         
               wanted in connection with Sonamura PS case No. 2024 SNM 045,         
               registered under sections 447, 302 and 34 of the IPC.                
                   Mr. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the applicants has       
               submitted that the applicants are in no way connected with the       
               alleged offence. It is further submitted that the applicants are     
               permanently residing within the jurisdiction of this court and they  
               will not abscond or tamper the evidence and will also not evade      
               the trial.                                                           
                   On the other hand, learned Additional PP has produced the        
               case diary and has strongly opposed the bail prayer.                 
                   I have perused the case diary as produced by the learned         
               Additional Public Prosecutor. I have also perused the case record.   

                                            2                                       
                                        Page                                        
                   I am prima facie of the opinion that the offence, as alleged,    
               against the applicants can at best come under the purview of         
               Section 304 Part II of the IPC. However, the matter is required to   
               be tried by the competent court. Since it is not the stage of        
               imposing punishment to the applicants, I am inclined to release      
               the applicants on anticipatory bail.                                 
                   Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of arrest, the      
                                          Sadek   Miah  and  Mithun  Miah           
               accused-applicants, namely,                                ,         
               shall be released on pre-arrest bail, on furnishing bond of Rs.      
               50,000/- each supported with one surety each of the like amount      
               to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority.                      
                   It is further directed that the applicants shall report to the   
               Investigating Officer twice in a week and shall co-operate with      
               the process of investigation. Further, it is directed that none of   
               the applicants shall leave the jurisdiction of Sepahijala District   
               without prior permission of the Investigating Officer.               
                   With the  above direction, the instant application stands        
               allowed and thus disposed of.                                        
                   Return back the case diary                                       
                                                           JUDGE                    
                                 Digitally signed by SAIKAT KAR                     
             SAIKAT       KAR                                                       
                                 Date: 2024.05.31 15:51:33                          
                                 +05'30'