1 2
Page of
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) NO.421 OF 2024
Sri Manindra Noatia
Vs.
The State of Tripura and ors.
T. AMARNATH GOUD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Datta, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. De, Add. G.A.
28.06.2024
Order
This present writ petition has been filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-
“(i) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the
nature of Mandamus and/or order/orders, direction/directions of like nature shall not
be issued whereby directing the Respondents for extension of tree registration
certificate.
(ii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the
nature of Mandamus and/or order/orders, direction/ directions of like nature shall not
be issued whereby directing the respondents for issuance of permission for extraction
of 30 nos. of trees.
(iii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the
nature of certiorari and/or order/orders, direction/ directions of like nature shall not
be issued whereby calling for the records pertaining to the instant writ petition from
the custody of the respondents and make the Rules absolute after hearing the both
sides.
AND
Make the Rules absolute after hearing the Parties
AND
Pass any other order/orders as this Hon’ble High Court may consider fit and
proper.”
2. Heard Mr. K. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner as well as Mr. K. De, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the
State-respondents.
3. Mr. K. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submits that his client applied for obtaining permission for
extraction of 30 nos. trees on 05.09.20219, but, no extraction permit
2 2
Page of
was obtained. In this regard, the petitioner has also submitted a
representation dated 25.04.2024 ventilating his grievance, but the
respondents remained non-responsive.
4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion to
the merit of the case, this present matter is disposed of with a
direction upon the respondents to consider the representation of the
petitioner dated 25.04.2024 in accordance with law within a period of
3(three) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
The said decision be communicated to the petitioner herein.
5. With the above observation and direction, this present
writ petition stands disposed of. Stay if any stands vacated. Pending
application(s), if any also stands closed.
JUDGE
suhanjit
RAJKUMAR Digitally signed by
RAJKUMAR
SUHANJIT
SUHANJIT SINGHA
Date: 2024.07.02
SINGHA
14:08:07 +05'30'