Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Tripura/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Sukanta Debnath and Anr. vs. the State of Tripura

Decided on 30 July 2024• Citation: AB/30/2024• High Court of Tripura
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          1  3                                      
                                      Page of                                       
                              HIGH COURT   OF TRIPURA                               
                                     AGARTALA                                       
                                    AB  30 of 2024                                  
               1. Sukanta Debnath(35 years)                                         
               S/o: Lt. Subodh Debnath, R/o: Vill: Paschim Bazar, P.S. Kalyanpur,   
               Khowai, Tripura.                                                     
               2. Smt. Bijaya Debnath (Dey)                                         
               W/o: Sri Ashish Dey, R/o: Kashipur, P.S: Budhjungnagar, West Tripura.
                                                            Accused-Applicant(s)    
                                                        ...…                        
                              Versus                                                
               The State of Tripura                                                 
               Represented by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Tripura. 
                                                               ….Respondent(s)      
               For the Applicant(s)     :    Mr. Debajit Biswas, Advocate           
               For the Respondent(s)   :     Mr. S. Ghosh, Addl. P.P                
                         HON’BLE   MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM   LODH                       
                                        Order                                       
            30/07/2024                                                              
                    This is an application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for granting
               anticipatory bail to the accused-applicants who are wanted by the police
               personnel in connection with Ambassa Women PS Case No.0009 of 2024   
               for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/326/34 of the IPC, later on
               added Sections 302/304(B) of the IPC.                                
                    The prosecution story, in brief, is that six years ago, the younger
               daughter of the complainant, namely, Puja Debnath got married with the FIR
               named accused person, namely, Sri Pralay Debnath as per Hindu rites and
               customs. After few months of their marriage, the husband and mother-in-law
               of the victim started to torture the victim both physically and mentally upon
               instigation of the other FIR named accused persons. During their conjugal
               life, the victim gave birth to a female child who is at present 3(three) years
               old. On 16.04.2024, at around 07:00 PM in the evening, the accused persons

                                          2  3                                      
                                      Page of                                       
               set fire upon the body of the victim, resulting which she received grievous
               burn injuries on her body and accordingly, she was shifted to AGMC and
               GBP Hospital where she was treated and on 01.05.2024, the victim namely,
               Puja Debnath expired. The accused persons filed one anticipatory bail
               application before the learned Sessions Judge, Dhalai Judicial District,
               Ambassa which was rejected vide order dated 14.04.2024. After registration
               of the said complaint as FIR, the Investigating Officer raided the house of
               the accused-applicants and there is serious apprehension of being arrested.
                    In this circumstance, the accused persons namely, Sri Sukanta   
               Debnath (35 years) and Smt. Bijaya Debnath (Dey) (32 years) have     
               approached this court praying for granting anticipatory bail.        
                    Mr. Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicants has
               submitted that Sri Sukanta Debnath, brother-law of the victim resides in
               Khowai District and Smt. Bijaya Debnath (Dey), sister-in-law of the victim
               resides in Kashipur, Agartala and they do not maintain any connection with
               Pralay Debnath, and unnecessarily they have been implicated with the case.
               It is their contention that the complainant implicated the accused-applicants
               only to harass them.                                                 
                    Heard Mr. Debajit Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the accused-
               applicants. Also heard Mr. S. Ghosh, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the
               State-respondent.                                                    
                    I have perused the case diary as produced by learned Addl. P.P. 
               After perusal of the case diary, in my opinion, it is a fit case to grant
               anticipatory bail to the accused-applicants. Accordingly, in the event of
               arrest, the accused-applicants, namely, Sri Sukanta Debnath and Smt. Bijaya
               Debnath (Dey) shall furnish a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

                                          3  3                                      
                                      Page of                                       
               thousand) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the
               Investigating Officer.                                               
                    However, it is directed that the accused-applicants shall cooperate
               with the process of investigation in all manner and also shall appear before
               the investigating officer as and when they are called for.           
                    In terms of the above, the anticipatory bail application stands allowed
               and disposed of.                                                     
                                                            JUDGE                   
       Rohit                                                                        
      SAIKA                                                                         
         Digitally signed                                                           
         by SAIKAT KAR                                                              
      T KAR Date: 2024.07.30                                                        
         16:48:19 +05'30'