Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Tripura/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

M. B Trading vs. the State of Tripura and Ors.

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: WP(C)/564/2023• High Court of Tripura
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                              1   3                                 
                                           Page of                                  
                                  HIGH  COURT  OF TRIPURA                           
                                         AGARTALA                                   
                                     WP(C)  No.564 of 2023                          
                M.B. Trading                                                        
                                                                    Petitioner(s);  
                                                              ………                   
                                            Versus                                  
                The State of Tripura & others                                       
                                                                  Respondent(s).    
                                                            ………                     
                For Petitioner(s)   : Mr. T.K. Deb, Advocate.                       
                For Respondent(s)   : Mr. Karnajit De, Addl. G.A.,                  
                                     Mr. Paramartha Datta, Advocate.                
                                                   APARESH   KUMAR   SINGH          
                  HON’BLE  THE  CHIEF  JUSTICE MR.                                  
                                                  ARINDAM   LODH                    
                            HON’BLE  MR. JUSTICE                                    
                                            Order                                   
                31/01/2024                                                          
                          Heard Mr. T.K. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.
                Karnajit De, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents-
                State. Also heard Mr. Paramartha Datta, learned counsel for the respondents
                No.5 & 6.                                                           
                2.        The GST registration of the petitioner has been suspended because
                of alleged non-compliance of the provisions of GST Act/Rules. Petitioner was
                served with a show cause notice on 08.02.2023 in Form GST REG-17 under
                Rule 22(1)/sub-rule (2A) of rule 21A to appear and submit his reply on
                15.02.2023. Petitioner submitted his reply vide Annexure-3 with relevant
                documents such as audited balance sheet, profit and loss account, copies of
                GSTR-3B  and GSTR-1, copies of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, statement of     
                GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B, party wise ledger of parties to whom he has supplied
                taxable goods, party wise ledger of parties to whom he has received taxable
                goods, copies of bank account statement and Form 26 AS/TDS for the period of

                                              2   3                                 
                                           Page of                                  
                2020-21 and 2021-22. However, his GST registration remained suspended, as
                no decision has been taken by the adjudicating authority till date. 
                3.        The writ petition was earlier disposed of by order dated  
                12.09.2023 directing the SGST authorities to issue a fresh show cause notice
                alleging specific contraventions of the TGST Act and the Rules made 
                thereunder within a stipulated period giving one week time to the petitioner to
                                                         ’s                         
                offer his specific replies with supporting documents. The SGST authorities
                were asked to take a decision in accordance with law thereafter. However, the
                SGST authorities preferred a review petition being Review Petition No.51/2023
                stating that the show cause notice has not been issued by the State Tax
                authorities. It was issued by the CGST authorities. In that view of the matter,
                the review petition was allowed and the writ petition was revived. Thereafter,
                the CGST authorities were impleaded as respondents No.5 & 6. Respondents
                                                          inter alia                
                No.5 & 6 have appeared and filed a Counter Affidavit stating that the
                GST  registration of the petitioner was suspended for non-submission of
                documents in support of the principal place of business. Petitioner neither
                replied through GST portal, nor submitted documents supporting proof of
                existence of business in terms of Section 2(85), 2(89) of the CGST Act, 2017 to
                the Jurisdictional officer. The respondents further state that the tax payer will
                be given personal hearing for compliance without which the suspension process
                cannot be completed. Registration of the petitioner has only been suspended
                and not cancelled.                                                  
                4.        Mr. T.K. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that
                petitioner is ready and willing to submit all supporting documents as required

                                              3   3                                 
                                           Page of                                  
                before the jurisdictional officer, Agartala-I Range, Tripura-I Division, CGST
                Commissionerate, Agartala.                                          
                5.        Mr. Paramartha Datta, learned counsel for the respondents No.5 &
                6, submits that writ petition can be disposed of by directing the petitioner to
                submit the relevant documents within a stipulated period and allowing the
                respondent- jurisdictional officer to take a decision on the show cause notice.
                6.        The writ petition is being disposed of with a direction upon the
                petitioner to submit his supporting documents within a period of one week from
                today. In case such documents are submitted by the petitioner, the respondent-
                jurisdictional CGST officer shall consider the reply of the petitioner along with
                the supporting documents in response to the show cause notice in accordance
                with law and take a decision thereupon within two weeks therefrom. Let it be
                made clear that we have made no observation on the merits of the case of the
                petitioner.                                                         
                7.        Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.  
                (ARINDAM  LODH),  J              (APARESH  KUMAR   SINGH), CJ       
                Pijush/ MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA                   
                            Date: 2024.02.01 16:20:24 +05'30'