Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Tripura/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Smt. Gayatri Chakraborty vs. Sri Anjan Chakraborty

Decided on 29 August 2024• Citation: Tr.P.(C)./9/2024• High Court of Tripura
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                              1   3                                 
                                           Page of                                  
                                  HIGH  COURT  OF TRIPURA                           
                                         AGARTALA                                   
                                      Tr.P.(C) No.9 of 2024                         
                Smt. Gayatri Chakraborty, wife of Sri Anjan Chakraborty, D/o Sri Chandan
                Chakraborty, resident of Gouranga Tilla, Ward No.10, P.S. Teliamura, P.O.-
                Teliamura, District-Khowai, Tripura.                                
                                                                   Petitioner (s).  
                                                             ………                    
                                            Versus                                  
                Sri Anjan Chakraborty, S/o Late Ranjan Chakraborty, Vill-Jamirghat, 
                Kamalghat, P.S. Lefunga, District-West Tripura.                     
                                                             .                      
                                                              ……  Respondent(s).    
                For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Dhiman Gope, Advocate,                     
                                    Ms. S. Banik, Advocate.                         
                For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kundan Pandey, Advocate.                    
                                                   APARESH   KUMAR   SINGH          
                  HON’BLE  THE  CHIEF  JUSTICE MR.                                  
                                            Order                                   
                29/08//2024                                                         
                         Heard learned counsel for the parties.                     
                         Petitioner-wife seeks transfer of suit T.S (RCR) No.70 of 2023
                from the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala to
                the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court, Khowai, Tripura. The marriage
                between the petitioner-wife and the respondent-husband was solemnized on
                08.02.2012. Thereafter, marital discord started and since then she has been
                staying with her parents in Khowai. More particularly, Teliamura as described
                in the cause title of the plaint as Ward No.-10, P.S. Teliamura was not
                                                            –                       
                specifically described in the cause title of the petition. However, petitioner has
                sought transfer of the suit on the ground that she will face genuine difficulties
                in attending to the proceeding of the suit before learned Family Court, West
                Tripura, Agartala as she has two minor children to maintain.        

                                              2   3                                 
                                           Page of                                  
                         Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is
                suffering from certain ailments and it would be onerous for her to travel from
                Telimura to Agartala for attending the proceedings of the suit.     
                         Mr. Kundan Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-husband
                on the other hand has objected to the prayer and submits that as per the
                description of address of the petitioner in the instant petition she is residing at
                Teliamura which is at the distance of about 43 km from Agartala and 33-34 km
                from K                                                itioner to    
                      howai. Therefore, it won’t make any difference for the pet    
                attend to the proceedings of the matrimonial suit even if it is being prosecuted
                before Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala. Moreover, respondent-husband is
                employed in the Forest Department in Agartala. He has been paying   
                maintenance @Rs.8000/- to the petitioner and the minor children. It may be
                difficult for him to attend to the proceedings of the suit at Khowai since he is an
                employed person. Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that the
                respondent is willing to pay the expenses for attending the proceedings of the
                Court to the petitioner-wife as and when she appears before the Court.
                         I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the
                parties and taken note of the attended materials facts. The grounds which are
                projected for seeking transfer of the matrimonial suit from the Court of the
                learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala to the Court of the learned
                Judge, Family Court, Khowai, Tripura                                
                                              indicate that the situation won’t change
                so far as the petitioner is concerned as in both cases petitioner will have to
                travel either to Agartala which is at 43 km from Teliamura or to Khowai which
                is around 33-34 km from Teliamura. In such circumstances, the convenience of
                the petitioner-                  , therefore, not be proper to transfer
                           wife won’t suffer. It would                              
                the suit from the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura,

                                              3   3                                 
                                           Page of                                  
                Agartala to the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court, Khowai, Tripura
                when there is no justifiable basis for that.                        
                         It is open for the petitioner to make such an application before the
                learned Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala in the pending proceeding for
                seeking cost of attending the proceedings which may be considered in
                accordance with law and in the light of the statements made on behalf of the
                respondent-husband as well.                                         
                         Accordingly, the  instant petition is dismissed. Pending   
                application(s), if any, also shall stand disposed of.               
                                             (APARESH  KUMAR   SINGH), CJ           
                Munna S M U NNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA                 
                          Date: 2024.08.30 17:10:35 +05'30'