Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Sikkim/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

State of Sikkim vs. Rup Narayan Rai (chamling) and Ors.

Decided on 25 September 2024• Citation: CRL.L.P/2/2024• High Court of Sikkim
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                         HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM                       
                                            Record of Proceedings                   
                                        CRL.L.P No.02  of 2024                      
            State of Sikkim                                           Petitioner    
              VERSUS                                                                
            Rup Narayan Rai (Chamling) and Others                   Respondents     
            Date : 25-09-2024                                                       
            CORAM  :                                                                
                      THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI  MADAN   RAI, JUDGE        
                      THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR  RAJ PRADHAN,  JUDGE          
            For Petitioner    Mr. Yadev Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor.       
                              Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Assistant Public Prosecutor.        
            For Respondents   Mr. K. T. Bhutia, Senior Advocate.                    
                              Mr. Romit Gurung, Advocate.                           
                                                 ORDER                              
                         Rai, J.                                                    
                              Heard on CRL.L.P No.02 of 2024 which is an application
                         filed under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
                         1973, seeking Leave to Appeal.                             
                              Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the 
                         Learned  Trial Court was  in  error in acquitting the      
                         Respondents as it had failed to appreciate the evidence of 
                         PWs  1, 2 and 4. That, the matter is required to be heard on
                         merits and hence the Petition be allowed.                  
                              Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents has no     
                         submissions to make in this context.                       
                              Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties and given
                         due consideration to the submissions put forth, we allow the
                         Leave Petition.                                            
                              Leave Petition stands disposed of accordingly.        
                              Heard on I.A. No. 01 of 2024 which is an application  
                         filed by the State-Appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation
                         Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 273 days delay in filing 
                                                                ’                   
                         the instant Appeal. The grounds for the delay have been    
                         detailed in the said I.A.                                  
                              Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents submits    
                         that in view of the grounds given therein they have no     
                         objection to the delay being condoned.                     
                                                 Page 1 of 2                        

                                         HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM                       
                                            Record of Proceedings                   
                              We  have considered the submissions and have also     
                         considered the grounds for the delay. We are of the view   
                         that the delay has been satisfactorily explained with sufficient
                         cause. Delay is accordingly condoned.                      
                              I.A. No.01 of 2024 stands disposed of.                
                              Register the Criminal Appeal.                         
                              Heard on admission.                                   
                              Admit the Appeal.                                     
                              Call for the records from the Learned Trial Court.    
                              Let Paper-Books be prepared.                          
                              List on 02-12-2024.                                   
                                  Judge                          Judge              
                                  25-09-2024                     25-09-2024         
            ds/bp/sdl                                                               
                                                 Page 2 of 2