Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Sikkim/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Ran Bahadur Kami vs. the Secretary/appellate Authority, Land Revenue Department and Ano.

Decided on 29 October 2024• Citation: WP(C)/30/2024• High Court of Sikkim
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                              Court No.3            
                               HIGH COURT  OF SIKKIM                                
                                  Record of proceedings                             
                               W.P. (C) No. 30 of 2024                              
          RAN BAHADUR   KAMI                           .... PETITIONER              
                                   VERSUS                                           
          THE SECRETARY/APPELLATE     AUTHORITY,                                    
          LAND  REVENUE  DEPARTMENT    & ANR.        .... RESPONDENTS               
          Date: 29.10.2024                                                          
          CORAM                                                                     
                       HON’BLE  MR. JUSTICE  BHASKAR   RAJ  PRADHAN,  J.            
          For Petitioner :    Ms. Mingma Lhamu  Sherpa, Legal Aid Counsel.          
                              (through V.C.).                                       
                              Mr. Lahang Limboo, Advocate.                          
          For Respondent :    Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Government Advocate.       
          No.1.               Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, Government Advocate.            
          For Respondent :    None.                                                 
          No.2.                                                                     
                                  ......                                            
                    The learned counsel for the petitioner desires to withdraw this 
               writ petition and approach the relevant authority for correction of  
               what they state are factually incorrect statement in the impugned    
               order. They are permitted to do so. The Writ Petition (C) No.30 of   
               2024 stands disposed as withdrawn.                                   
                                                            Judge                   
          Index: yes/No                                                             
     to/  Internet: yes/No