Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Sikkim/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Ambika Pradhan and Ano. vs. Purna Kumar Pradhan and Ors.

Decided on 15 May 2024• Citation: CRP/2/2024• High Court of Sikkim
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                     COURT NO.1     
                              HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK                        
                                    Record of Proceedings                           
                                    CRP No. 02/2024                                 
          AMBIKA PRADHAN  AND ANR.                     PETITIONER (S)               
                                         VERSUS                                     
          PURNA KUMAR  PRADHAN  AND ORS.               RESPONDENT  (S)              
          For Petitioners     :    Mr. Jorgay Namka, Senior Advocate with Ms. Phu   
                                   Doma Bhutia, Legal Aid Counsel.                  
          For Respondent Nos. :    Mr. S.S. Hamal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sabina  
          1, 2 and 8               Chettri, Mr. Leada T. Bhutia, Mr. Pradeep        
                                   Sharma and Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocates.         
          For Respondent Nos. :    Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Assistant Government Advocate. 
          3 to 7                                                                    
          Date: 15/05/2024                                                          
          CORAM:                                                                    
               HON’BLE  MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH   SOMADDER,   CHIEF JUSTICE           
                                            …                                       
                                     J U D G M E N T                                
               This is an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
          1908, (for short, ‘CPC, 1908’) taken out by the petitioners against an order dated
            th                                                                      
          20  February, 2024, passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Gangtok, in
          Title Appeal No.04/2023.                                                  
               By the order impugned, the learned Principal District Judge proceeded to
          dismiss the application filed by the appellants (being the petitioners herein)
          under Order 41 Rule 25 read with section 107 of the CPC, 1908, for framing
          additional issue and also under Order 41 Rule 27 read with section 107 of the
          CPC, 1908, for adducing additional evidence.                              
               After having perused the impugned  order in detail, (which is not    
          reproduced herein only in order to avoid prolixity), this Court is of the view that
          the same is supported with cogent and justifiable reasons and as such, does not
          warrant any revision by this Court since neither of the provisions of sub-section
          (a), (b) and (c) of section 115 (1) of the CPC, 1908, are attracted in the facts of
                                                                        Page 1 of 2 

                                                                     COURT NO.1     
                              HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK                        
                                    Record of Proceedings                           
          the instant case, under any circumstances. Needless to mention, this Court is
          aware of the power of revision as provided under section 115 of the CPC, 1908,
          and its inherent limitation to interfere with cogent and justifiable orders passed
          by the learned Courts below.                                              
               The instant application seeking civil revision filed by the petitioners is,
          therefore, liable to be dismissed and stands accordingly dismissed.       
                                                   (Biswanath Somadder)             
                                                        Chief Justice               
  jk/ami                                                                            
                                                                        Page 2 of 2