[2024:RJ-JP:49153]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14910/2024
1. Mithun S/o Hemraj, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Barana,
Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran. (At Present
Confined In District Jail Baran)
2. Liladhar S/o Hemraj, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Barana,
Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran. (At Present
Confined In District Jail Baran)
3. Hansraj S/o Sujan, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Tulsan,
Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran. (At Present
Confined In District Jail, Baran).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpender Kumar Pandey
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
29/11/2024
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483
of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in
connection with FIR No.231/2024 registered at Sadar Baran,
District Baran (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections
126(2), 115(2), 352, 110 & 3(5) of BNS. During investigation,
offences punishable under Sections 126(1), 115(2), 118(1), 352,
110 & 3(5) of BNS have been found proved against the
petitioners.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that
the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case.
[2024:RJ-JP:49153] [CRLMB-14910/2024]
(2 of 3)
Learned counsel submits on account of petty dispute, FIR has
been registered against the petitioners. He submits that now
parties have resolved their dispute amicably. Petitioners are in
custody since their date of arrest. Further custody of the
petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned
counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that maximum term
of sentence of the alleged offences is seven years & parties have
resolved their dispute amicably; looking to the custody period, but
without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case,
I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed
that accused-petitioners – 1) Mithun S/o Hemraj, 2) Liladhar
S/o Hemraj & 3) Hansraj S/o Sujan shall be released on bail
provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two
sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand
Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the
stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court
to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of
hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. Office is directed to send copy of this order forthwith to the
accused petitioners through concerned Jail Superintendent. Office
is also directed to send copy of this order to the concerned trial
[2024:RJ-JP:49153] [CRLMB-14910/2024]
(3 of 3)
court forthwith. After receiving copy of this order, the learned trial
court shall intimate the accused petitioner regarding this bail
granting order.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
GAUTAM JAIN /65