Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Rajasthan/
  4. 2024/
  5. February

Sanwariya @ Sanwra S/o Kanhiyalal vs. the State of Rajasthan

Decided on 29 February 2024• Citation: CRLMB/7008/2023• High Court of Rajasthan
Download PDF

Read Judgment


               [2024:RJ-JP:10534]                                                   
                     HIGH  COURT   OF JUDICATURE    FOR RAJASTHAN                   
                                    BENCH   AT JAIPUR                               
                   S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7008/2023       
                1.    Sanwariya  @  Sanwra  S/o  Kanhiyalal, Aged About 18          
                      Years And 6 Months R/o Naya Bhadurpura  Thana Hindoli,        
                      District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In J.c. Distt      
                      Bundi)                                                        
                2.    Puroshottam  @  Prithviraj S/o Kalu Lal, Aged About 22        
                      Years, R/o Naya Bhadurpura Thana Hindoli, District Bundi      
                      (Raj.) (At Present Confined In J.C. Distt Bundi)              
                                                              ----Petitioners       
                                          Versus                                    
                1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor                
                2. Indera  Bai W/o  Motilal R/o Village Naya Bahadur  Pura,         
                Hindoli, Bundi (Raj.)                                               
                                                            ----Respondents         
                For Petitioner(s)   :   Ms. Harshita Sharma, Adv.                   
                For Respondent(s)   :   Mr. Chandragupt Chopra-PP                   
                      HON'BLE   MR. JUSTICE  ANOOP   KUMAR   DHAND                  
                                          Order                                     
               29/02/2024                                                           
               1.   This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed  
               by the petitioners in connection with FIR No.534/2022 registered at  
               Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi wherein they are charged for  
               offences punishable under Sections 376(D) and 306 of IPC (later      
               on, they are charged for offences punishable under Sections 376(D)   
               and 306 of IPC and Section 5(G)/6 POCSO Act, 2012).                  
               2.   Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the     
               allegations levelled against the petitioners, they committed rape    
               with the victim who committed suicide thereafter. Counsel submits    
               that there is no eye-witness of the alleged incident and as per the  

               [2024:RJ-JP:10534]                            [CRLMB-7008/2023]      
                                          (2 of 2)                                  
               version of the complainant, Nandu Bai informed her about  the        
               incident. Counsel submits that Nandu Bai has not supported the       
               version of prosecution and she has turned hostile. Counsel submits   
               that the Forensic Science Laboratory report is not corroborated the  
               allegations of rape levelled against the petitioners. Counsel submits
               that looking to the long incarceration of the petitioners, indulgence
               of bail be granted to the petitioners.                               
               3.   Per contra, learned  Public Prosecutor opposed  the bail        
               application and submitted that not only gang rape was committed      
               with the victim but she also committed suicide by consuming poison   
               after the aforesaid rape committed with her. Counsel submitted that  
               charge-sheet has been submitted against the accused persons for      
               the offences punishable under Section 376 (D) and 306 IPC and        
               after commencement   of the  trial, it has reached to its final      
               conclusion and the same is at fag end, therefore, the petitioners are
               not entitled to get indulgence of bail.                              
               4.   Heard and  considered the submissions made   at Bar and         
               perused the material available on the record.                        
               5.   Looking to the allegations levelled against the petitioner and  
               looking to the gravity of the matter and also looking to the fact that
               the trial has reached to its fag end, this Court is not inclined to  
               grant bail to the petitioners.                                       
               6.   Hence, the present bail application stands dismissed.           
                                                   (ANOOP  KUMAR  DHAND),J          
               MR/137