[2024:RJ-JP:52619]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15641/2024
Aditya Singh S/o Sh. Rajendra Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
In Front Of Shastri Park, Phir Pada, Nasiya Colony, Gangapur
City, Sawai Madhopur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandely
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
20/12/2024
1. The accused-petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection
with FIR No.543/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar,
Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2),
74, 307, 134, 324(4) & 324(5) of the BNS, 2023, the petitioner
has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482
of the BNSS.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused
the material available on record.
4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel
for the petitioner and so also the fact that the injuries sustained
by the complainant party are simple in nature, this Court without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deems just and
[2024:RJ-JP:52619] [CRLMB-15641/2024]
(2 of 2)
proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-
petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section
482 of the BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of
arrest of the petitioner- Aditya Singh S/o Shri Rajendra Singh,
in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be released on bail,
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-
with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned
Police Station on the following conditions:-
(i) that the petitioner shall make himself
available for interrogation by a police officer as and
when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or
indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to
the court or any police officer, and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India
without previous permission of the court.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Ashish Kumar /451