IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4180 of 2018
Gobinda Chandra Dash …. Petitioner
Mr. P. S. Das, Advocate
-versus-
Collector-cum-D.M, Keonjhar …. Opposite Parties
& Others Mr. B. Mohanty, AGA
Ms. B. Mohanty, Adv. for O.P.3
COROM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
30.09.2024
Order No
05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the
following prayer:-
“ (i) quash the Notice, dated 28.02.2018 issued by
the Opp. Party No.2 under Annexure-4 by
concurrently holding the same as illegal, improper
and not sustainable and / or maintainable in the
eye of law and thereby direct the Opp.Party No.3 to
consider the Appeal / Objection of the petitioner
under Annexure-5 within a stipulated period as may
be prescribed by this Hon’ble Court for the interest
of justice”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner
states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made
a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-5
and the same may be directed to be considered within
a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no
objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after
going through the records, this Court, without expressing any
// 2 //
opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition
directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation
filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 and pass appropriate
order in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months
from the date of production of certified copy of this order with
due communication to the Petitioner.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Subrat
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK
Reason: Authentication
Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
Date: 03-Oct-2024 18:12:18
Page 2 of 2