Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Orissa/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Pravakar Pradhan vs. State of Odisha

Decided on 30 May 2024• Citation: ABLAPL/5467/2024• High Court of Orissa
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                     IN  THE HIGH  COURT   OF ORISSA   AT CUTTACK                   
                                ABLAPL   No.5467  of 2024                           
                       Pravakar  Pradhan           ….      Petitioner               
                                        Mr. Padmanava Jena, Advocate                
                                          -versus-                                  
                       State of Odisha             ….      Opp. Party               
                                        Mr. Arupananda Das                          
                                        Addl. Govt. Advocate                        
                                         CORAM:                                     
                                    JUSTICE  S.K. SAHOO                             
                                         ORDER                                      
        Order No.                                                                   
                                       30.05.2024                                   
            01.           This  matter   is taken  up   through  Hybrid             
                     arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).                
                          Heard  learned counsel for the  petitioner and            
                     learned counsel for the State.                                 
                          This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C.          
                     for grant of  anticipatory bail to the petitioner in           
                     connection with G.R. Case No.320 of 2024 arising out           
                     of Kandarpur P.S. Case No.49 of 2024 pending in the            
                     Court of learned J.M.F.C.-II (Cog. Taking), Cuttack for        
                     alleged  commission   of  offences under   sections            
                     294/323/   341/420/466/467/468/471/506     of  the             
                     Indian Penal Code.                                             
                           Perused  the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory          
                     bail application.                                              
                                                                 Page 1 of 3        

                           Learned  counsel for the petitioner submitted            
                     that the case arises out of a complaint petition which         
                     was  forwarded  under section 156(3)  of Cr.P.C. to            
                     Kandarpur  police station and accordingly, the case            
                     was  registered. Learned counsel further submitted             
                     that the petitioner has also filed a complaint case            
                     against  the complainant/informant  Manas   Ranjan             
                     Behera  in the  Court of  learned J.M.F.C.-II (Cog.            
                     Taking), Cuttack which was registered as 1 C.C. Case           
                     No.42 of 2024. Learned counsel supplied the copy of            
                     the  complaint petition, which is taken on  record.            
                     Learned counsel further submitted that the nature of           
                     dispute between  the parties is civil in nature which          
                     has  been given  a colour of criminal case and the             
                     offences are triable by Magistrate and therefore, the          
                     anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may be         
                     favourbably considered.                                        
                           Learned  counsel for the  State opposed  the             
                     prayer for anticipatory bail.                                  
                           Considering  the  submissions made   by  the             
                     learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature         
                     of accusation against the petitioner and the fact that         
                     the offences are triable my Magistrate, I am inclined          
                     to release the  petitioner on anticipatory bail and            
                     accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of           
                     arrest of  the  petitioner in connection  with the             
                     aforesaid case, he  shall be  released on  bail on             
                                                                 Page 2 of 3        

                     furnishing bail bond  of  Rs.10,000/-  (rupees ten             
                     thousand) with two  sureties each for the like amount          
                     to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further      
                     conditions that he shall make  himself available for           
                     interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he          
                     shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,        
                     threat or promise to any person acquainted with the            
                     facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing        
                     such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer.       
                           Violation of any of the above conditions shall           
                     entail cancellation of bail.                                   
                          The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.                    
                          Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on         
                     proper application.                                            
                                                   S.K. Sahoo, J.                   
                                                 (Vacation  Judge)                  
            sipun                                                                   
                       Signature Not Verified                                       
                       Digitally Signed                                             
                       Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA                                      
                       Designation: Senior Stenographer                             
                       Reason: Authentication                                       
                       Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK                      
                       Date: 31-May-2024 11:13:56                                   
                                                                 Page 3 of 3