Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Orissa/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Chandra Sekhar Mohapatra vs. Pravat Ku.mohapatra

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: CRP/36/2009• High Court of Orissa
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                      IN THE HIGH  COURT  OF ORISSA  AT CUTTACK                   
                                   CRP  No.36 of 2009                             
                  Chandra Sekhar Mohapata & others              Petitioners       
                                                      ….                          
                                      Ms. Susrita Sahoo, Advocate on behalf of    
                                     Mr. Jagajiban Pradhan, Advocate              
                                          -versus-                                
                  Pravat Kumar Mohapatra & others           Opposite Parties      
                                                      ….                          
                                         CORAM:                                   
                                MR. JUSTICE  MURAHARI   SRI RAMAN                 
                       HON’BLE                                                    
        Order No.                        ORDER                                    
                                         31.07.2024                               
           15.                                                                    
                        This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.              
                   2.   Learned counsel for the Petitioners, by filing a memo in  
                   Court today, states that he has no instruction in this matter. The said
                   memo be kept on record.                                        
                    3.  In view of the above, the civil revision petition stands  
                    disposed of for want of instructions.                         
                                                           (M.S. Raman)           
                                                             Judge                
       Aswini                                                                     
    Signature Not Verified                                                        
    Digitally Signed                                                              
    Signed by: ASWINI KUMAR SETHY                                                 
    Designation: Personal Assistant (Secretary-in-charge)                         
    Reason: Authentication                                                        
    Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK                                          
    Date: 31-Jul-2024 18:14:47