Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Manipur/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Union of India and Another vs. Thoudam (o) Anita Devi and 4 Others

Decided on 26 September 2024• Citation: MACApp./6/2021• High Court of Manipur
Download PDF

Read Judgment


        KHOIROM                                                                   
                Digitally signed by                                               
                KHOIROM                                                           
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR                           
        BIPINCHAND                                                                
                BIPINCHANDRA SINGH                                                
                Date: 2024.09.26     AT IMPHAL                                    
        RA SINGH                                                                  
                16:19:46 +05'30'                                                  
                               MAC  APP. No. 6 of 2021                            
                1.  The Union of India represented by the Secretary,              
                    Home, Government of India.                                    
                2.  The Commandant, 34th Assam Rifles, Agartala,                  
                    Tripura.                                                      
                                                           Appellants             
                                                         ….                       
                                        - Versus -                                
                1.  Smt. Thoudam (O) Anita Devi, aged about 42 years,             
                    W/o  late Thoudam Jiten Singh of Leishangthem                 
                    Thoubal, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District,               
                    Manipur.                                                      
                2.  Km. Thoudam Alisia Devi, aged about 21 years, D/o             
                    late Thoudam jiten Singh of Leishangthem Thoubal,             
                    P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur.               
                3.  Km. Thoudam Domi Devi, aged about 16 years, D/o               
                    late Thoudam Jiten Singh of Leishangthem Thoubal,             
                    P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur being          
                    a minor represented by her natural mother, Smt.               
                    Thoudam (O) Anita Devi, aged about 42 years, W/o              
                    late Thoudam Jiten Singh of Leishangthem Thoubal,             
                    P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur.               
                4.  Master Thoudam David Singh, aged about 13 years               
                    S/o late Thoudam Jiten Singh of Leishangthem                  
                    Thoubal, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District,               
                    Manipur being a minor represented by her natural              
                    mother, Smt. Thoudam (O) Anita Devi, aged about 42            
                    years, W/o late Thoudam Jiten Singh of Leishangthem           
                    Thoubal, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District,               
                    Manipur.                                                      
                5.  Md. Rahimuddin, aged about 61 years, S/o (L) Md.              
                    Basiruddin of Chirai Mayang Imphal, P.O. & P.S.               
                    Mayang Imphal, Imphal West District, Manipur.                 
                                                       ….. Respondents            
                MAC APP No. 6 of 2021                          Page 1             

                                     B E F O R E                                  
                     HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU                    
                For the appellants :    Mr. S. Samarjit, Senior PCCG              
                For the respondents :   Mr. S. Jibon, Advocate                    
                Date of hearing    :    08.08.2024                                
                Date of Judgment &                                                
                Order              :    26.09.2024                                
                                 JUDGMENT & ORDER                                 
                                       (CAV)                                      
                [1]      Heard Mr. S. Samarjit, learned senior PCCG appearing for 
                the appellants and Mr. S. Jibon, learned counsel appearing for the
                respondents.                                                      
                [2]      The present appeal has been instituted under Section 173 
                of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and order dated
                29.08.2019 passed by the Ld. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Manipur
                in MAC Case No. 50 of 2011 with the following prayers:            
                         (i)   To admit this appeal and call for records of MAC   
                               Case No. 50 of 2022.                               
                         (ii)  To set aside the impugned judgment & order and     
                               award dated 29.08.2019 passed in MAC Case No.      
                               50 of 2011 as the same was not passed after        
                               proper finding on the materials of the case.       
                MAC APP No. 6 of 2021                          Page 2             

                [3]      During the course of hearing, Mr. S. Samarjit, learned   
                senior PCCG appearing for the appellants draws the attention of this
                Courts order dated 04.04.2022 passed in MC(MAC APP) No. 5 of 2021 
                (Ref. : MAC APP. No. 6 of 2021). The operative portion of the said order
                is extracted herein below:                                        
                              The miscellaneous cases are accordingly disposed of 
                         “[5]                                                     
                         granting stay of the Award under appeal subject to the   
                         appellants depositing 50% of the amount awarded along with
                         interest thereon, calculated till today, to the credit of Motor
                         Accident Claims Case No. 50 of 2011 on the file of the Motor
                         Accident Claims Tribunal, Lamphelpat, within two months from
                         the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”            
                [4]      Further, the learned senior PCCG draws the attention of  
                this Court’s order impugned herein passed in Motor Accident Claims
                Case No. 50 of 2011. The relevant portions of the said order are  
                extracted herein below:                                           
                              The claimant as PW No. 1 has stated that her husband
                         “17.                                                     
                         deceased Thoudam Jiten Singh was serving as a Pharmacist in
                         the Health Department, Govt. of Manipur, drawing a monthly
                         salary of Rs. 12,124/- only per month and this has been  
                         supported by the exhibits at Ext. A-7 and Ext. A-8.      
                         18.  This Court has also examined that the deceased      
                         husband of the claimant was only 37 years old at the time of
                         his health and was in sound health condition.            
                              Hence, the claimant is entitled to the following award
                         for compensation amount as detailed below:               
                          Sl. Details of the award/compensation Total amount      
                          No.                                                     
                          1.  Loss of earing due to death Rs. 20,95,028/-         
                              calculated for Pharmacist at the                    
                              rate of Rs. 12,124/- per month:                     
                              Rs. 12,124/- X 12 months X 16                       
                              multiplier = Rs. 23,27,808/- -                      
                              1/10th i.e. Rs. 2,32,780/- = Rs.                    
                              20,95,028/-                                         
                          2.  Loss of consortium       Rs. 40,000/-               
                          3.  Funeral Expenses         Rs. 15,000/-               
                          4.  Total                    Rs. 21,50,028/-            
                MAC APP No. 6 of 2021                          Page 3             

                [5]      Both the learned counsels appearing for the parties      
                admitted the fact that                                            
                                –                                                 
                          (i) There was an accident involving the motorcycle      
                              (Bajaj Platina) of the respondent and the vehicle   
                              of the appellants i.e. Tata 407 Truck on            
                              31.12.2009. Due to that accident, the respondent    
                              sustained bodily injuries.                          
                          (ii) Vide order dated 04.04.2022 passed in MC(MAC       
                              APP) No. 5 of 2011 (Ref. : MAC APP No. 6 of 2021),  
                              the appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the  
                              amount awarded with interest calculated till the    
                              day of passing the order to the account of Motor    
                              Accident Claims Tribunal within a period of 2 (two) 
                              months. Accordingly, the appellants deposited the   
                              calculated amount and the same was already          
                              withdrawn by the respondent.                        
                          (iii) A sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) was     
                              paid to the respondent as agreed upon in an         
                              agreement deed dated 08.01.2010 executed            
                              between the two parties.                            
                [6]      After hearing both the learned counsels appearing for the
                parties at length and after going through the facts and circumstances
                as narrated above and the above admitted facts, the present case is
                MAC APP No. 6 of 2021                          Page 4             

                disposed by directing the appellants to pay the remaining half of the
                awarded amount without interest after deducting a sum of Rs.      
                1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) which had already been paid to the   
                respondent as per the agreement deed dated 08.01.2010 and also a  
                sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) which had already
                been deposited to the Registry in connection with filing of the instant
                appeal as per Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to the 
                respondent within a period of 2 (two) months.                     
                         Further, it is directed to the appellants to deposit the said
                remaining amount of Rs. 9,50,014/- (Rupees nine lakh fifty thousand
                and fourteen) to the account of Registrar General, High Court of  
                Manipur.                                                          
                [7]      The Registry is directed to release the said amount of Rs.
                9,50,014/- (Rupees nine lakh fifty thousand and fourteen) with the said
                sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) as aforementioned
                in favour of the respondent subject to proper verification.       
                [8]      With the above direction, the present appeal is disposed 
                of.                                                               
                                                  JUDGE                           
                Bipin                                                             
                MAC APP No. 6 of 2021                          Page 5