Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Manipur/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Yumkhaibam Bijubala Devi and 7 Others vs. State of Manipur and 2 Others

Decided on 28 May 2024• Citation: WP(C)/672/2023• High Court of Manipur
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                  Item No. 73     
                            IN THE  HIGH  COURT   OF  MANIPUR                     
                                        AT IMPHAL                                 
                                     WP(C) No. 672 of 2023                        
                        Yumkhaibam Bijubala Devi & 7 Ors.                         
                                                             .Petitioner/s        
                                                           ….                     
                                            - Versus                              
                                                   –                              
                        State of Manipur & 2 Ors.                                 
                                                           .... Respondent/s      
                                             BEFORE                               
                         HON’BLE   MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR    SHARMA             
                                              Order                               
                   28.05.2024                                                     
                   [1]       Mr. Nabachandra, learned counsel for the petitioners, on
                   instruction, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present
                   writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.                
                   [2]       Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned G.A. for the State respondent,
                   has no objection.                                              
                   [3]       Recording the submission made at the bar, writ petition is
                   dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one, if so advised.
                                                                JUDGE             
                        Kh. Joshua Maring                                         
                              Digitally signed by                                 
                    KH. JOSHUA                                                    
                              KH. JOSHUA MARING                                   
                    MARIN G   Date: 2024.05.29                                    
                              10:18:04 +05'30'