Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Manipur/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Longjam Subhaschandra Singh vs. Vineet Joshi and 2 Ors

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: CONT CAS(C)/41/2024• High Court of Manipur
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                  Item No. 69     
                            IN THE  HIGH  COURT   OF  MANIPUR                     
                                        AT IMPHAL                                 
                                   Cont.Cas(C) No. 41 of 2024                     
                        Longjam Subhaschandra Singh                               
                                                             .Petitioner/s        
                                                           ….                     
                                            - Versus                              
                                                   –                              
                        Vineet Joshi & 2 Ors.                                     
                                                           .... Respondent/s      
                                             BEFORE                               
                         HON’BLE   MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR    SHARMA             
                                              Order                               
                   31.07.2024                                                     
                   [1]       Heard  Ms. Malemleima, learned counsel for the       
                   petitioner, Ms. Sharmila, learned counsel on behalf of respondent No.
                   1, Mr. L. Rajesh, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and Mr. B.
                   Kirankumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3.              
                   [2]       It is submitted that the cause of the contempt petition
                   does not survive and as such, contempt petition may be closed. 
                   [3]       Recording the submission made at the bar, contempt   
                   petition is disposed of.                                       
                                                                JUDGE             
                        Kh. Joshua Maring                                         
                   Digitally signed by                                            
        KH. JOSHUA                                                                
                   KH. JOSHUA MARING                                              
        MARING     Date: 2024.08.01                                               
                   10:01:38 +05'30'