Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Manipur/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Lianlemsiam P. @ Siam Phaipi vs. Planning and Development Authority and 6 Others

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: PIL/6/2022• High Court of Manipur
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          1                                       
       LAIREN                                                                     
             Digitally signed                                                     
             by                                                                   
       MAYUM                                                                      
             LAIRENMAYUM                                           I tem No. 52   
             INDRAJEET                                                            
       INDRAJE                                                                    
                              I N THE HI GH COURT OF MANI PUR                     
             SINGH                                                                
       ET    Date:                                                                
                                       AT I MPHAL                                 
             2024.08.01                                                           
       SINGH 16:29:41 +05'30'                                                     
                                     PI L No. 6 of 2022                           
                     Lianlemsiam P. @ Siam Phaipi                                 
                                                                 Petitioner       
                                      Vs.                                         
                     Planning & Development Authority & 6 ors.                    
                                                               Respondents        
                                         BEFORE                                   
                    HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL                
                   HON'BLE MRS. JUSTI CE GOLMEI GAI PHULSHI LLU KABUI             
                                        ORDER                                     
             31.07.2024                                                           
             Siddharth Mridul, C.J.:                                              
                      Mr. Dimal Kumar Haobam, learned counsel, appears on behalf of the
             State; and Ms. S. Gangarani, learned counsel, appears on behalf of respondent No.
             1.                                                                   
                      None appears on behalf of the petitioner.                   
                      There has been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 
             25.06.2024, the last date of hearing, as well.                       
                      Office note dated 29.06.2024 indicates that notice of default
             dispatched on dated 27.06.2024 is returned due to having nobody at   
                                              “unserved”                          
             the address provided therein, as shown in the Report at flag (R), submitted and
             duly verified by Court Attendant & AR-I I I respectively.            
                                           to be keen to prosecute the present PI L.
                      The petitioner doesn’t seem                                 
                      The same is accordingly dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
                            JUDGE                   CHI EF JUSTI CE               
             Indrajeet