Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Madhya Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Shivam @ Kali vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: MCRC/3639/2024• High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                         1                                        
                IN   THE    HIGH    COURT      OF   MADHYA      PRADESH           
                                      AT GWALIOR                                  
                                         BEFORE                                   
                          HON'BLE   SMT. JUSTICE  SUNITA  YADAV                   
                                         st                                       
                               ON THE  31  OF JANUARY,  2024                      
                           MISC. CRIMINAL   CASE  No. 3639 of 2024                
               BETWEEN:-                                                          
               SHIVAM @ KALI S/O SHRI BADANSINGH, AGED ABOUT                      
               26  YEARS, ADIWASI MOHALLA  THANA  MEHGAON                         
               DISTRICT BHIND M P (MADHYA PRADESH)                                
                                                                .....APPLICANT    
               (BY MR. AMIT PACHAURI - ADVOCATE)                                  
               AND                                                                
               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH INCHARGE  POLICE                       
               STATION PS BAROHI (MADHYA PRADESH)                                 
                                                              .....RESPONDENT     
               (BY MR. DINESH SAVITA - PANEL LAWYER)                              
                    This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
               following:                                                         
                                          ORDER                                   
                    This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of
               the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to Crime No.34 of 2023 registered at Police
               Station Barohi, District Bhind (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 379, 356 of
               IPC.                                                               
                    Learned counsel for the applicant/accused argued that the applicant is
               innocent and has been falsely implicated. Only Rs.500/- has been seized from
               h is possession. Co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the
               learned trial Court as well as by this Court. Mangalsutra has not been seized
               from his possession. He is in custody since 23.11.2024. After conclusion of
  Signature Not Verified                                                          
  Signed by: ALOK KUMAR                                                           
  Signing time: 1/31/2024                                                         
  08:26:30 PM                                                                     

                                         2                                        
               investigation, charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, his custodial
               interrogation is not required any more. He is permanent resident of District
               Bhind (M.P.). and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with
               the prosecution evidence. He shall abide by all the terms and conditions which
               may be imposed by this Court upon him. On these grounds, he prays for grant
               of bail to the applicant.                                          
                    O n the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State
               vehemently opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.   
                    Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary
               available on record.                                               
                    Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without
               expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is
               directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in
               the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent
               surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.  
                    This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following
               conditions by the applicant:-                                      
                    1)  The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the
               bond executed by him/her;                                          
                    2) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may
               be;                                                                
                    3)     The applicant will not indulge himself/herself in extending
               inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the
               case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the
               Police Officer, as the case may be;                                
                    4 ) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of
  Signature Not Verified                                                          
  Signed by: ALOK KUMAR                                                           
  Signing time: 1/31/2024                                                         
  08:26:30 PM                                                                     

                                         3                                        
               which he/she is accusedh;                                          
                    5)  The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the
               trial; and                                                         
                    6) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the
               trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.             
                    Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the
               Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and
               necessary action.                                                  
                   E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance,
               if possible, by the office of this Court.                          
                  Certified copy as per rules.                                    
                                                            (SUNITA YADAV)        
                                                                JUDGE             
               AKS                                                                
  Signature Not Verified                                                          
  Signed by: ALOK KUMAR                                                           
  Signing time: 1/31/2024                                                         
  08:26:30 PM