Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Madhya Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Mamta vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: MCRC/3545/2024• High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                         1                                        
                IN   THE    HIGH    COURT      OF   MADHYA      PRADESH           
                                       AT  INDORE                                 
                                         BEFORE                                   
                      HON'BLE   SHRI JUSTICE  PREM  NARAYAN   SINGH               
                                         st                                       
                               ON THE  31  OF JANUARY,  2024                      
                           MISC. CRIMINAL   CASE  No. 3545 of 2024                
               BETWEEN:-                                                          
               1.   MAMTA  W/O  PREMCHAND,  AGED  ABOUT  28                       
                    Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE GALLA                       
                    KOTHAR,   THATHIPUR,   GIRD,   GWALIOR                        
                    (MADHYA PRADESH)                                              
               2.   SURAJ  SIKARWAR  S/O ASHOKSINGH,  AGED                        
                    ABOUT   22   YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR                        
                    GURUDWARA    MOHALLA,   MATA    COLONY,                       
                    AMBAH MORENA  (MADHYA  PRADESH)                               
                                                                .....APPLICANT    
               (BY SHRI AKASH RATHI, ADVOCATE)                                    
               AND                                                                
               THE STATE OF MADHYA  PRADESH  STATION HOUSE                        
               OFFICER  THROUGH   POLICE  STATION  SENDHWA                        
               GRAMIN  DIST. BARWANI (MADHYA PRADESH)                             
                                                              .....RESPONDENT     
               (BY SHRI AJAY GUPTA, PANEL LAWYER)                                 
                    This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
               following:                                                         
                                          ORDER                                   
                    Heard and perused the record.                                 
                    This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicants under
               Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail. The applicant
               is arrested in relation to Crime No.825/2023, registered at Police Station
               Sendhwa Gramin, District-Barwani for the offence under Section 8/20 of NDPS
               Act. The applicants are in jail since 02.12.2023.                  
  Signature Not Verified                                                          
  Signed by: VINDESH                                                              
  RAIKWAR                                                                         
  Signing time: 1/31/2024                                                         
  6:44:16 PM                                                                      

                                         2                                        
                    2. As per prosecution story, 8 kg ganja and 3 kg ganja have been seized
               from the possession of applicants Suraj and Mamta respectively.    
                    3 . Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are
               innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Invetigation is over and
               charge sheet has been filed. He further submits that there is no criminal case
               registered against the applicants. The applicants are in jail since 02.12.2023 i.e.
               almost two months is going to be completed. Final conclusion of trial will take a
               sufficient long time. Under these circumstances, counsel prays for grant of bail
               to the applicants.                                                 
                    4. On the other hand, learned Govt. Advocate for the State has opposed
               and prayed for its rejection but fairly submitted that no criminal case has been
               registered against the applicants.                                 
                    5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking t o the facts
               and circumstances of the case and custody period, I am of the view that it is a
               case, in which applicants may be released on bail. Consequently, without
               commenting on the merits of the case, bail application under Section 439 of the
               Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicants,
               stands allowed.                                                    
                    6. It is directed that applicants be released on bail on their furnishing a
               personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) each
               with one solvent surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial
               Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a
               condition that they shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the
               dates fixed by it during trial. They shall abide by all the conditions enumerated
               under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.                                    
  Signature Not Verified                                                          
  Signed by: VINDESH                                                              
  RAIKWAR                                                                         
  Signing time: 1/31/2024                                                         
  6:44:16 PM                                                                      

                                         3                                        
                    7. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of
               bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become
               ineffective.                                                       
                    Certified copy as per rules.                                  
                                                     (PREM NARAYAN SINGH)         
                                                            JUDGE                 
               Vindesh                                                            
  Signature Not Verified                                                          
  Signed by: VINDESH                                                              
  RAIKWAR                                                                         
  Signing time: 1/31/2024                                                         
  6:44:16 PM