Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Karnatak/
  4. 2024/
  5. June

Sri Balakrishna K vs. the Manager

Decided on 28 June 2024• Citation: MFA/3022/2019• High Court of Karnatak
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          - 1 -                                     
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:24198             
                                                   MFA No. 3022 of 2019             
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU                    
                                           TH                                       
                          DATED  THIS THE 28 DAY OF JUNE, 2024                      
                                        BEFORE                                      
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT  CHANDANGOUDAR                    
                    MISCELLANEOUS  FIRST APPEAL NO. 3022 OF 2019 (MV-I)             
                  BETWEEN:                                                          
                  SRI BALAKRISHNA K                                                 
                  S/O KANNIYAPPAN,                                                  
                  AGED  ABOUT 57 YEARS,                                             
                  R/AT NO.1791/26                                                   
                   TH        TH                                                     
                  6  CROSS, 4  MAIN,                                                
                  PRAKASHNAGAR,                                                     
                  BENGALURU-560  021.                                               
                                                         …APPELLANT                 
                  (BY SRI. GURUDEVA PRASAD K.T., ADVOCATE)                          
                  AND:                                                              
                  1.  THE MANAGER                                                   
                      SHRIRAM GENERAL  INSURANCE COMPANY  LTD,                      
                      TP. CLAIMS HUB, NO.4/5,                                       
                       RD                                                           
                      3  FLOOR, S.V. ARCADE,                                        
     Digitally signed by B                                                          
     K                                                                              
                      BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD,                                        
     MAHENDRAKUMAR                                                                  
                      OFF BANNERGHATTA  ROAD,                                       
     Location: High                                                                 
     Court of Karnataka                                                             
                      IIMB POST, BENGALURU-560 076.                                 
                  2.  MR. KHADER PASHA                                              
                      S/O AHAMED BABA                                               
                      R/AT NO.37, 'M' CROSS,                                        
                      NEW GURAPPANAPALYA,                                           
                      BANNERGHATTA  ROAD,                                           
                      BENGALURU  - 560 029.                                         
                                                      …RESPONDENTS                  
                  (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-1;                            
                   V/O DATED 15.12.2023 NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT)            

                                          - 2 -                                     
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:24198             
                                                   MFA No. 3022 of 2019             
                       THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE           
                  JUDGMENT  AND AWARD  DATED  03.08.2017 PASSED IN MVC              
                  NO.4990/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL SMALL             
                  CAUSES  JUDGE  AND  XX  A.C.M.M. AND MEMBER  MACT,                
                  BENGALURU   (SCCH-24), PARTLY ALLOWING   THE CLAIM                
                  PETITION    FOR    COMPENSATION     AND    SEEKING                
                  ENHANCEMENT   OF COMPENSATION.                                    
                       THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS               
                  DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:                           
                                       JUDGMENT                                     
                       This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act   
                  has been filed by the claimant, challenging the judgment and award
                  dated 3.8.2017, passed by the XXII Additional Small Causes Judge  
                  and  XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate & MACT,          
                  Bengaluru (SCCH-24) in MVC No.4990/2017.                          
                       2. The appellant/claimant sustained injuries in a road traffic
                  accident on 13.7.2017 and subsequently filed a claim petition under
                  Section 166 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1989, seeking just  
                  and  proper compensation. The Tribunal awarded a total            
                  compensation of Rs.9,72,200/- with interest at the rate of 8% per 
                  annum. Being not satisfied with the compensation amount awarded   
                  by the Tribunal, the claimant is appealing for an enhancement of  
                  the compensation amount.                                          
                       3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the       
                  respondent, the Insurance Company.                                

                                          - 3 -                                     
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:24198             
                                                   MFA No. 3022 of 2019             
                       4. The claimant having sustained accidental injuries on      
                  13.7.2017 is not disputed, and he was aged about 55 years at the  
                  time of the accident. It is alleged that, the claimant was working as
                  Lathe operator and proprietor of M/s Sharmila Engineering works,  
                  and was earning Rs.15 Lakh per annum, and due to the accident     
                  he suffered permanent disablement and is unable to lead normal    
                  life as earlier and has closed the workshop and suffered huge loss.
                       5. The claimant suffered the following injuries:             
                       "Deglowing injury over right arm, multiple abrasion over     
                       right upper limb, tenderness over right wrist, tenderness    
                       over left side of chest, tenderness and swelling over right  
                       forearm."                                                    
                       6.  The doctor, who was examined as P.W.2, assessed          
                  the permanent physical disability to the limb at 65.62% and 21.87%
                  to the whole body.                                                
                       7.  Considering the nature of the injury sustained by the    
                  claimant, the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- awarded by the Tribunal        
                  towards pain and suffering is deemed insufficient and is therefore
                  enhanced by an additional Rs.50,000/-, bringing the total to      
                  Rs.1,50,000/- under this head.                                    
                       8.  The claimant was treated as inpatient for a period 53    
                  days in various hospitals, Bengaluru. Therefore, considering the  
                  duration of treatment, a sum of Rs.75,000/- is awarded towards    
                  incidental expenses such as conveyance, nourishment and attendant 
                  charges as against Rs. 50,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.          

                                          - 4 -                                     
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:24198             
                                                   MFA No. 3022 of 2019             
                       9.  Given the nature of injuries, a sum of Rs.55,000/- is    
                  awarded towards ‘future medical expenses’ as against Rs. 30,000/- 
                  awarded by the Tribunal                                           
                       10. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to enhanced         
                  compensation under the following heads:                           
                                           Awarded by    Awarded by this            
                                            Tribunal         Court                  
                                              Rs.            Rs.                    
                  Pain and suffering        1,00,000/-     1,50,000/-               
                  Food   &    Nourishment,                                          
                  Conveyance &   attendant  50,000/-        75,000/-                
                  charges                                                           
                  Medical Expenses          4,42,175/-     4,42,175/-               
                  Loss of income during laid up                                     
                                            1,00,000/-      100,000/-               
                  period                                                            
                  Loss of amenities of life and 2,50,000/-  2,50,000/-              
                  disability                                                        
                  Future medical expenses    30,000/-       55,000/-                
                  Total                    9,72,175/-     10,72,175/-               
                       11. In summary, the appellant/claimant is entitled to a total
                  compensation of Rs.10,72,175/- as opposed to Rs.9,72,175/-        
                  awarded by the Tribunal. The enhanced compensation amounts to     
                  Rs.1,00,000/-. To this extent, the award passed by the Tribunal is
                  modified. The enhanced compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- shall not    
                  carry interest.                                                   
                       12. The respondent, the Insurance Company, is directed to    
                  deposit the enhanced amount within a period of three months from  
                  the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The entire

                                          - 5 -                                     
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:24198             
                                                   MFA No. 3022 of 2019             
                  enhanced compensation amount is to be released in favor of the    
                  appellant/claimant.                                               
                       The appeal is disposed of.                                   
                                                  Sd/-                              
                                                 JUDGE                              
                  HR