Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Karnatak/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Dadapeer vs. Sharanayyaswamy

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: MFA/102759/2014• High Court of Karnatak
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          - 1 -                                     
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-D:2211                  
                                                 MFA No. 102759 of 2014             
                   IN THE HIGH COURT  OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD   BENCH                 
                                         ST                                         
                       DATED  THIS THE 31  DAY OF JANUARY, 2024                     
                                        BEFORE                                      
                        THE HON'BLE  MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA                       
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.102759 OF 2014 (MV-I)              
                  BETWEEN:                                                          
                  DADAPEER S/O. NABISAB,                                            
                  AGE: 10 YEARS, MINOR,                                             
                  M/G HIS REAL FATHER BY                                            
                  NAME NABISAB S/O. RAJESAB MULLA @ YAMANUR,                        
                  AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST,                                
                  R/O: NEERLOOTI, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL.                     
                                                           …APPELLANT               
                  (BY SRI. M. AMAREGOUDA, ADVOCATE)                                 
                  AND:                                                              
                  1.  SHARANAYYASWAMY S/O. NAGAYYASWAMY,                            
                      AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER OF TRACTOR,                        
                      BEARING NO.KA-37/T-8592 AND                                   
                      TRAILER BEARING NO.KA-37/8593,                                
                      R/O: KRADONI, TQ: GANGAVATHI,                                 
                      DIST: KOPPAL.                                                 
                  2.  MARIYAPPA S/O. LACHAMAPPA BANDI,                              
                      AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: OWNER OF TRACTOR,                         
                      BEARING NO.KA-37/T-8592 AND TRAILER                           
      Digitally signed BEARING NO.KA-37/8593                                        
      by SAMREEN                                                                    
                      R/O: KARADONI, TQ: GANGAVATHI,                                
      AYUB                                                                          
      DESHNUR                                                                       
                      DIST: KOPPAL.                                                 
      Date:                                                                         
      2024.02.03                                                                    
                  3.  THE BRANCH MANAGER,                                           
      12:58:18 +0530                                                                
                      UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,                              
                      BRANCH OFFICE SANMAN TOURIST                                  
                      COMPLEX ISLAMPUR, GANGAVATHI.                                 
                                                         …RESPONDENTS               
                  (BY SRI. S.S. KOLIWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3;                           
                     R1 AND R2 SERVED)                                              
                       THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION       
                  173(1) OF MV ACT 1988, AGAINST JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD:            
                  20.01.2014, PASSED IN MVC.NO.121/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR   
                  CIVIL JUDGE & M.A.C.T. AT GANGAVATHI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM   
                  PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF              
                  COMPENSATION.                                                     

                                          - 2 -                                     
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-D:2211                  
                                                 MFA No. 102759 of 2014             
                       THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR               
                  HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:             
                                       JUDGMENT                                     
                       Heard Sri M.Amare Gouda, advocate for appellant/             
                  claimant and Sri S.S.Koliwad, advocate for respondent No.3/       
                  Insurance Company.                                                
                  2.   Claimant is the appellant challenging the validity of the    
                  judgment and  award passed in MVC No.121/2012 dated               
                  20.01.2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and MACT,        
                  Gangavathi, insofar as quantum of compensation is concerned.      
                  3.   Admitted facts are that claimant sustained accidental        
                  injuries in the road traffic accident that occurred on 17.11.2011 
                  at about 7.00 pm. When the claimant was playing outside the       
                  Government Primary School, he met with an accident involving      
                  Tractor Trailer bearing registration No.KA-37/T-8592 and 8593.    
                  4.   The claim petition, on contest came to be allowed in part    
                  granting Rs.74,392/- as compensation.                             
                  5.   Being aggrieved by the same, the claimant has preferred      
                  the present appeal challenging the impugned judgment and          

                                          - 3 -                                     
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-D:2211                  
                                                 MFA No. 102759 of 2014             
                  award  contending that the quantum of compensation is             
                  inadequate.                                                       
                  6.   Per contra, Sri S.S.Koliwad, advocate for the Insurance      
                  Company  supported the impugned judgment contending that          
                  eight year old boy suffered injury, he is cured and he is now     
                  enjoying life as normal person and sought for dismissal of the    
                  appeal.                                                           
                  7.   Taking note of the fact that eight year old boy suffered     
                  abdominal injury, Tribunal awarded compensation in a sum of       
                  Rs.74,392/-. On  the head  of pain and suffering only             
                  Rs.20,000/- is awarded. On the head of loss of prospectus in      
                  life only Rs.20,000/- is awarded, Rs.19,392/- is awarded          
                  towards  medical expenses, towards diet, nourishment,             
                  attendant charges and conveyance Rs.15,000/- is awarded.          
                  8.   Instead of enhancing compensation on each and every          
                  head, like loss of amenities and other aspects, enhancing the     
                  compensation to Rs.1,25,000/- from Rs.74,392/- would meet         
                  the ends of justice, taking note of the fact that boy was         
                  inpatient for a period of 60 days.                                

                                          - 4 -                                     
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-D:2211                  
                                                 MFA No. 102759 of 2014             
                  9.   Accordingly, the following:                                  
                                         ORDER                                      
                         (i) Appeal is allowed in part.                             
                         (ii) As against compensation in a sum of                   
                              Rs.74,392/- awarded by the Tribunal, the              
                              claimant is entitled to Rs.1,25,000/- with            
                              interest at the rate of 6% from the date of           
                              claim petition till realization.                      
                         (iii) Balance amount to  be deposited by                   
                              Insurance Company within a period of four             
                              weeks from today.                                     
                                                  Sd/-                              
                                                 JUDGE                              
                  kcm                                                               
                  List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47