Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Karnatak/
  4. 2024/
  5. April

Sri. Devendra Naik. S vs. the State of Karnataka

Decided on 30 April 2024• Citation: WP/12518/2024• High Court of Karnatak
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          - 1 -                                   
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:16939-DB       
                                                      WP No. 12518 of 2024        
                    IN THE HIGH COURT  OF KARNATAKA  AT BENGALURU                 
                        DATED  THIS THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024                   
                                       PRESENT                                    
                      THE  HON'BLE MR JUSTICE  B M SHYAM PRASAD                   
                                          AND                                     
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA               
                        WRIT PETITION NO. 12518 OF 2024 (S-KSAT)                  
                    BETWEEN:                                                      
                        SRI. DEVENDRA NAIK. S                                     
                        AGED ABOUT  36 YEARS                                      
                        S/O SRI SHEKAR NAIK,                                      
                        C/O SRI RAVEESH,                                          
                        NEAR RENUKA  STUDIO,                                      
                        2ND CROSS, VIDHAYALAYA,                                   
                        GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR  DISTRICT-572216.                      
                                                       …PETITIONER                
                    (BY SRI. J PRASHANTH.,ADVOCATE)                               
   Digitally                                                                      
   signed by                                                                      
   NARASIMHA                                                                      
   MURTHY                                                                         
                    AND:                                                          
   VANAMALA                                                                       
   Location:                                                                      
   HIGH                                                                           
                    1.  THE STATE OF KARNATAKA                                    
   COURT OF                                                                       
   KARNATAKA                                                                      
                        REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY                           
                        DEPARTMENT  OF SCHOOL                                     
                        EDUCATION AND  LITERACY                                   
                        M S BUILDING,                                             
                        DR. AMBEDKAR  VEEDHI,                                     
                        BANGALORE-560001.                                         

                                          - 2 -                                   
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:16939-DB       
                                                      WP No. 12518 of 2024        
                    2.  DEPUTY DIRECTOR  AND DISCIPLINARY                         
                        AUTHORITY,                                                
                        DEPARTMENT  OF SCHOOL                                     
                        EDUCATION AND  LITERACY,                                  
                        OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,                            
                        TUMKUR  DISTRICT-572216.                                  
                                                     …RESPONDENTS                 
                    (BY SRI.MOHAMMED  JAFFAR SHAH., AGA)                          
                         THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227              
                    OF THE CONSTITUTION  OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE             
                    A WRIT, ORDER  OR  DIRECTION IN THE  NATURE  OF               
                    CERTIORARI QUASHING  THE NOTICE ALONG  WITH THE               
                    ARTICLE OF  CHARGE   DATED  20/11/2023 BEARING                
                    NO.E5  DOORU.10/22-23   ISSUED   BY   THE   2ND               
                    RESPONDENT  VIDE ANNEXURE-A8.                                 
                         THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR  ORDERS, THIS               
                    DAY  B.M.  SHYAM   PRASAD   J,  DELIVERED   THE               
                    FOLLOWING:                                                    
                                        ORDER                                     
                         The petitioner is aggrieved by the Order dated           
                    24.04.2024 [Annexure-A] by  the Karnataka  State              
                    Administrative Tribunal [for short, 'Tribunal'] in            
                    Application No.1807/2024.  The Tribunal, by this              
                    order, has opined that the petitioner's request for           
                    grant of ex parte interim order cannot be considered          
                    without issuance of notice to the respondents.                

                                          - 3 -                                   
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:16939-DB       
                                                      WP No. 12518 of 2024        
                         2.   The petitioner asserts that he was duly             
                    appointed as 'Assistant Teacher Grade-II' after his           
                    successful  participation in   the  examination               
                    conducted for selection. The petitioner contends that         
                    his name  is part of the provisional list and he is           
                    issued with the appointment order after scrutiny of           
                    the objections filed, publication of final/additional list    
                    and the original records. In fact, Sri J Prashanth, the       
                    learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the          
                    petitioner is selected as part of the additional final list   
                    published because some selected candidates did not            
                    report to duty and that the petitioner's probationary         
                    period is also declared.                                      
                         3.   Insofar as the reason for the application           
                    before the Tribunal, Sri J Prashanth submits that the         
                    petitioner is issued with Articles of Charge dated            
                    20.11.2023  [as per Annexure-A8   filed with the              
                    Tribunal] but the Charges against the petitioner are          

                                          - 4 -                                   
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:16939-DB       
                                                      WP No. 12518 of 2024        
                    completely vague and given the circumstances, the             
                    Charge should have been specific.                             
                         4.   On perusal of the records, and the Articles         
                    of Charge dated 20.11.2023, this Court must opine             
                    that the petitioner could successfully contend that           
                    the Charges are vague, and in that event, the very            
                    continuation of the proceedings would be in jeopardy.         
                    These circumstances must be considered even at the            
                    threshold stage. It is undisputed that the enquiry is         
                    scheduled to be held on 03.05.2024, and this Court            
                    on a careful consideration of the circumstances, is of        
                    the  considered  opinion, to  facilitate effective            
                    adjudication, that the proceedings scheduled to be            
                    held on 03.05.2024 must be deferred for a period of           
                    six weeks, and  the present petition disposed of              
                    requesting the Tribunal to decide the application on          
                    merits within such time. Sri Mohammed Jaffar Shah             
                    submits that if the application is filed before the           
                    Tribunal for expeditious disposal on copies being             

                                          - 5 -                                   
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:16939-DB       
                                                      WP No. 12518 of 2024        
                    served with the  office of the learned Additional             
                    Government  Advocate,  there would  be  due  co-              
                    operation. In the light of the afore, the following:          
                                        ORDER                                     
                              The  petition stands disposed of                    
                         deferring the proceedings scheduled to be                
                         held on 03.05.2024 for a period of six [6]               
                         weeks reserving liberty to the petitioner to             
                         request the  Tribunal  for expeditious                   
                         disposal of the application. The Tribunal                
                         is also requested  to dispose  of the                    
                         application within a period of six weeks as              
                         now enabled.                                             
                                                Sd/-                              
                                              JUDGE                               
                                                Sd/-                              
                                              JUDGE                               
                    AN/-