Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Bikash Kumar Allias Vikash Kumar vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 29 October 2024• Citation: A.B.A./7005/2024• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                       IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JHARKHAND  AT RANCHI                   
                                A.B.A. No.7005 of 2024                              
                                         -----                                      
                        Bikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar, S/o Madan Saw, R/o village-    
                        Baidh Bigha, P.O. & P.S.-Hariharganj, District-Palamau.     
                                                     .......... Petitioner.         
                                       -Versus-                                     
                        The State of Jharkhand       .......... Opp. Party.         
                                         -----                                      
                        CORAM  : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR                 
                                         -----                                      
                        For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, Advocate       
                        For the State  :   Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P.                
                                         -----                                      
                        Order No.02                  Date: 29.10.2024               
                    1. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection      
                       with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 registered under     
                       Sections 272/273/290/414/120B/34 of the Indian Penal         
                       Code, 1860 and Section 47a of the Excise Act, 1915.          
                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the          
                       petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case   
                       and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.   
                       The petitioner is the owner-cum-driver of pickup vehicle     
                       bearing registration no.JH-03Z-6026. It has been alleged     
                       that spirit was being loaded on the said pickup vehicle      
                       taken out from the tanker bearing registration no.PB-        
                       65AA-9213. In Fact, the said spirit was being loaded in the  
                       said pickup vehicle as he was engaged on hire basis by the   
                       co-accused-Arvind Yadav for the said purpose. He had no      
                       idea that the spirit being loaded on the said vehicle was    
                       illegal. Co-accused-Arvind Yadav has already been granted    
                                                               th                   
                       anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 30 July,    
                       2024 passed in A.B.A. No.4924 of 2024. The petitioner,       

                       however, undertakes to co-operate in the ongoing             
                       investigation. Hence, he may be given the privilege of       
                       anticipatory bail.                                           
                    3. Le                                                           
                         arned A.P.P. opposes the petitioner’s prayer for grant of  
                       anticipatory bail.                                           
                    4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and             
                       considering the materials available on record, I am inclined 
                       to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, 
                       the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or   
                       surrender before the court below within three weeks from     
                       today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of  
                       Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties       
                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned       
                                        st                                          
                       Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in        
                       connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No.77 of 2024           
                       subject to the conditions as laid down under Section         
                       482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.      
                                                (Rajesh Shankar, J.)                
              Vikas/                                                                
                                         -2-                                        
                                                        A.B.A. No.7005 of 2024