Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Rana Singh Alias Kanhai Singh vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 29 October 2024• Citation: A.B.A./6509/2024• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                       IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JHARKHAND  AT RANCHI                   
                                A.B.A. No.6509 of 2024                              
                                         -----                                      
                        1. Rana Singh @ Kanhai Singh, S/o Chandra Mohan Singh,      
                          R/o Durgasthan Road, Near Central Jail, P.O. & P.S.-      
                          Dumka (T), District-Dumka.                                
                        2. Kishan Keot @ Teta Kewat, S/o Ashok Kewat, R/o village-  
                          Teen Bazar, Shree Ram Para, P.O. & P.S.-Dumka (T),        
                          District-Dumka.                                           
                                                     .......... Petitioners.        
                                       -Versus-                                     
                        The State of Jharkhand       .......... Opp. Party.         
                                         -----                                      
                        CORAM  : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR                 
                                         -----                                      
                        For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate            
                        For the State  :   Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P.        
                                         -----                                      
                        Order No.02                  Date: 29.10.2024               
                    1. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection  
                       with Dumka (T) P.S. Case No.136 of 2022 registered           
                       under Sections 341/323/307/382/504/506/34 of the Indian      
                       Penal Code, 1860.                                            
                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the         
                       petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present      
                       case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the    
                       F.I.R. The allegation made in the written report is highly   
                       exaggerated. Even if the content of the written report is    
                       taken to be true, the main allegation of assaulting,         
                       snatching money, mobile phone and silver chain of the        
                       informant is against co-accused-Gopal Rakshit. There is      
                       general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners that  
                       they assaulted the           -Santosh Soren. The             
                                       informant’s friend                           
                       petitioners, however, undertake to co-operate in the         

                       ongoing investigation. Hence, they may be given the          
                       privilege of anticipatory bail.                              
                    3. Learned A.P.P. opposes the petitioners prayer for grant of   
                                                     ’                              
                       anticipatory bail.                                           
                    4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and             
                       considering that there is no specific allegation of assault  
                       against the petitioners, I am inclined to enlarge them on    
                       anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above       
                       named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the  
                       court below within three weeks from today, shall be          
                       released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-      
                       (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the       
                       like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief        
                       Judicial Magistrate, Dumka in connection with Dumka (T)      
                       P.S. Case No.136 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid   
                       down  under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik          
                       Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.                                      
                                                (Rajesh Shankar, J.)                
              Vikas/                                                                
                                         -2-                                        
                                                        A.B.A. No.6509 of 2024