Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Chandan Kumar Yadav Alias Chandan Yadav vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 31 May 2024• Citation: B.A./5074/2024• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                    IN THE HIGH  COURT   OF JHARKHAND     AT RANCHI                 
                                    B.A. No.5074 of 2024                            
                    Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan Yadav                             
                                                      …    Petitioner               
                                           Versus                                   
                                                      …                             
                    The State of Jharkhand                 Opposite Party           
               Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR  SRIVASTAVA                 
                    For the Petitioner : Mr. Avishek Prasad, Adv.                   
                    For the State      : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, Addl. P.P.         
                 Order No.02/Dated- 31.05.2024                                      
                         Heard learned counsel for the parties.                     
                    2.   The petitioner has been made accused in connection with    
                    Nawajaipur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2022 registered under Sections 379, 414,
                    188 of Indian Penal Code, Section 21 of MMDR Act, Rule 54 of JMMC
                    Rule and Rule 13(i) of JM(PITS) Rule 2017.                      
                    3.   As per F.I.R., the allegation against the petitioner is that on
                    02.06.2022, informant and the police team raided illegal brick kilns and
                    found several brick kilns operating without any valid documents. The
                    petitioner is the owner of the said brick kiln under the name of “DBN
                    BRICKS” in Hurdag, Nawa Jaipur and about 5.50 Lac bricks were   
                    seized. The petitioner denied the allegations but failed to produce any
                    supporting documents regarding the same.                        
                    4.   Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the  
                    petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has
                    been falsely implicated in this case. There is allegation of making 5.50
                    Lac bricks in the forest area without any licence. Petitioner undertakes
                    to co-operate with the trial of the case and remain physically present on
                    each and every date till the conclusion of the trial and shall not indulge
                    in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses
                    or gain over them. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no
                    criminal antecedent. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody
                    since 13.04.2024 without any rhymes and reasons. Hence, the petitioner
                    may be enlarged on bail.                                        
                    5.   Learned Addl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the  
                    petitioner. Hence, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.  

                    6.   Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature
                    of allegation against petitioner coupled with materials available on
                    record and period of custody of the petitioner, I am inclined to release
                    the above named petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner named
                    above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
                    Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like
                    amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Palamu in connection
                    with Nawajaipur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2022 with condition that petitioner
                    shall appear physically on each and every date during the trial of case
                    till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is dispensed with for
                    sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and with
                    further condition that petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the
                    prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them.
                                          (Pradeep Kumar   Srivastava, J.)          
                    Sachin