Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Central Coalfields Limited Through Sri Uma Shankar Singh vs. the State of Jharkhand and Ors

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: WPC/6062/2016• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                  IN THE  HIGH COURT   OF JHARKHAND    AT RANCHI                    
                                W.P. (C) No.6062 of 2016                            
                                         ----                                       
               Central Coalfields Limited, a Company incorporated under the         
               Companies Act, having its registered Office at Darbhanga House,      
               P.O.-Ranchi University, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand),   
               through Sri Uma Shankar Singh, son of Sri R.P.Singh presently        
               working and posted as Project Officer, Tapin North Colliery,         
               P.O. Tapin, P.S.-Charhi, District-Ramgarh (Jharkhand) …. …. Petitioner
                                       Versus                                       
               1. The State of Jharkhand                                            
               2. District Transport Officer Cum Certificate Officer,               
                 Hazaribagh, P.O.& P.S.-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh             
                 (Jharkhand)                           ….   ….   Respondents        
                                         ----                                       
                    CORAM:  HON’BLE  MR. JUSTICE  RAJESH KUMAR                      
                                         ----                                       
               For the Petitioner       : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Adv.                  
                                         Mr. Sahay Gaurav Piyush, Adv.              
               For the Resp.-State      : Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP-II                    
                                        : Mr. Gaurang Jadodia, AC to GP-II          
                                         ----                                       
                         st                                                         
               05/Dated: 31 July, 2024                                              
               1.   Heard learned counsel for the parties.                          
               2.   The present writ petition has been filed for following relief:- 
                    “For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) quashing
                    the entire certificate proceeding being Certificate Case No.257/15-16
                    including the order dated 16.09.2016 (Annexure-5 series) issued by
                    respondent No.2 whereby and whereunder he has been pleased to   
                    issue arrest warrant for realization of demanded amount under   
                    certificate against the petitioner.”                            
               3.   It appears that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered
               by the order dated 11.03.2015 passed in W.P.(C) No.3782 of 2013 and batch
               cases.                                                               
               4.   In that view of the matter, the entire proceeding in Certificate Case
               No.257/15-16 including the order dated 16.09.2016 (Annexure-5 series)
               issued by the respondent No.2 is, hereby, quashed and set aside.     
               5.   However, it is open to the State Government to resort to appropriate
               legal proceeding in terms of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 realising fine for

               contravention of the provision of the Act. It is made clear that this Court has
               not examined the merit of the case so far as the culpability of the petitioner
               for the alleged violation of the provision of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 is
               concerned.                                                           
               6.   With above observation, the present writ petition stands allowed and
               disposed of.                                                         
                                                          (Rajesh Kumar, J.)        
          Shahid-                                                                   
          Uploaded                                                                  
                                          2                                         
                                                            W.P. (C) No.6062 of 2016