Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Mamta Agiwal vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: Cr.M.P./1655/2024• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


          IN  THE  HIGH    COURT    OF  JHARKHAND        AT  RANCHI                 
                              Cr.M.P.  No.1655   of 2024                            
                                        ------                                      
                Mamta Agiwal & Another            …          Petitioners            
                                        Versus                                      
                                                  …                                 
                The State of Jharkhand & Another            Opposite Parties        
                                         ------                                     
           CORAM:                                                                   
                    HON’BLE  MR.  JUSTICE  ANIL KUMAR    CHOUDHARY                  
                                        ------                                      
                 For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, Advocate              
                 For the State     : Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P.                  
                                         ------                                     
                Order No:-03 Dated:-31-07-2024                                      
                     Heard the parties.                                             
                     Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to
                withdraw this Cr.M.P.                                               
                     Permission is accorded.                                        
                     Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn.       
                                                (Anil Kumar    Choudhary,   J.)     
      Saroj/