Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Dildar Sk Alias Ansari Alias Dildar Ansari vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: B.A./11118/2023• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


               IN THE  HIGH COURT  OF  JHARKHAND   AT RANCHI                        
                         B.A. No. 11118 of 2023                                     
               1. Dildar SK @ Ansari @ Dildar Ansari                                
               2. Sahid Ansari          ...  ...  ...  Petitioners/Applicants       
                                        Versus                                      
               The State of Jharkhand   …    …    ...  Opposite Party               
                                        ---------                                   
               CORAM:     HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR                          
                                        ---------                                   
               For the Petitioners/Applicants: Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate            
               For the State:           Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, A.P.P.              
               For the Informant:       Mr. Parambir Singh Bajaj, Advocate          
                                        ---------                                   
               05/Dated: 31.01.2024                                                 
               1.   Heard the parties.                                              
               2.   The applicants, who are in custody since 14.09.2023, have approached this
               Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No. 177 of
               2023 registered for the offence under Sections 364A and 34 of the Indian Penal
               Code.                                                                
               3.   It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that
               complete set of FIR along with its enclosures have been annexed with the present
               bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.        
               4.   Innocence of the applicants has been claimed and undertaking has been
               given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that there was a friendly
               loan between the parties. This case has been lodged due to some misconception.
               The matter has already been settled outside the Court. On the above basis, prayer
               for bail has been made.                                              
               5.   Learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the informant
               have opposed the prayer for bail.                                    
               6.   Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail.
               Accordingly, the applicants, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on
               furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two
               sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial
               Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No. 177 of 2023,
               subject to condition that the applicants will submit self-attested photocopy of their
               Aadhaar Card and also submit their mobile numbers before the learned court
               below which they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of
               this case without prior permission of the court.                     
                                                      (Rajesh Kumar, J.)            
            VK                                                                      
          Uploaded