Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Md Shamshad Alam vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: A.B.A./4889/2023• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                            - 1 -                                   
                    IN THE  HIGH  COURT   OF  JHARKHAND    AT  RANCHI               
                                   A.B.A No.4889  of 2023                           
                    Md. Shamshad  Alam                                              
                    @ md. Shamshad                    ……     Petitioner             
                                       Versus                                       
                    1.   The State of Jharkhand                                     
                    2.   Nandlal Das                  …... Opp.  Parties            
                                       ---------                                    
               CORAM:    HON'BLE   MR.  JUSTICE  RAJESH  KUMAR                      
                                       ---------                                    
                    For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate               
                    For the State      : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P                  
                    For the O.P. No.02 : Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate                
                                       ---------                                    
               04/Dated: 31 s t January, 2024                                       
                    1.   Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.P.P and 
                    learned counsel for the O.P. No.02.                             
                    2.   Apprehending his arrest, the applicant has approached this 
                    Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail, in connection with
                    Complaint Case No.2108 of 2015, registered for the offence under
                    Sections 406/ 420/ 120B of the Indian Penal Code.               
                    3.   Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and            
                    undertaking has been given for co-operating with the investigating
                    agency and participation in the trial. It has been submitted that
                    present case has arisen out of a complaint case. this application is
                    merely an employee of the company and he has no concern with    
                    the business of the company. He is not the beneficiary. On the  
                    above basis, prayer for anticipatory bail has been made.        
                    4.   Learned A.P.P and learned counsel for the O.P. No.02 have  
                    opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.                       
                    5.   Considering the above facts, I am inclined to grant the    
                    privilege of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the
                    applicant is directed to surrender in the court below within four
                    weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, the
                    court below shall enlarge the applicant on bail on his furnishing
                    bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the
                    like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate,
                    1st Class, Giridih in connection with Complaint Case No.2108 of 
                    2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of
                    the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further, this applicant will submit
                    self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his 
                    mobile number before the learned court below which he will      
                    always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this
                    case without prior permission of the court.                     
                                                      (Rajesh Kumar,  J.)           
               Chandan/-