IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 165 of 2022
Dhrub Bhagat aged about 71 years, son of Nathuni Bhagat, Resident
of Bhartia Colony, P.O. and P.S. Sahibganj, Dist. Sahibganj
Petitioner
… …
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Ram Narayan Bhagat, aged about 71 years and two months, son of
Late Jagdish Bhagat, Resident of Chandmari Road, P.O. and P.S.
Kankarbag, Dist. (Patna) Bihar Opp. Parties
… …
With
Cr. Revision No. 231 of 2022
Dhurb Bhagat @ dhrub Bhagat aged about 71 years, son of Nathuni
Bhagat, Resident of Bhartia Colony, P.O. and P.S. Sahibganj, Dist.
Sahibganj Petitioner
… …
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sanjoy Kumar Bhagat @ Sanjay Kr. Bhagat aged about 47 years,
son of Ram Narayan Bhagat, Resident of Chandmari Road, P.O.
and P.S. Kankarbag, Dist.- Patna (Bihar)
Opp. Parties
… …
---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
---
For the Petitioner : Ms. Sharda Kumari, Advocate
For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Vijay Shankar Jha, Advocate
For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.
---
06/29.02.2024 Criminal Revision No. 165 of 2022 has been filed against the
order dated 17.12.2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sahibganj
in Criminal Appeal No. 10/2020 whereby the learned Sessions Judge
has allowed the Criminal Appeal No. 10/2020 and has set aside the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.01.2020 passed
by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with
G.R. Case No. 40/2004 T.R. No. 1074/2020 registered under Section
138 of the N.I. Act and under Section 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal
Code.
2. Criminal Revision No. 231 of 2022 has been filed against the
order dated 17.12.2021 passed by Learned Sessions Judge, Sahibganj
in Criminal Appeal No. 13/2020 whereby the learned Sessions Judge
has allowed the Criminal Appeal No. 13/2020 and has set aside the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.01.2020 passed
by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with
G.R. Case No. 40/2004 T.R. No. 1074/2020 registered under Section
2
138 of the N.I. Act and under Section 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal
Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present revision
applications have been filed against the judgment of acquittal passed
by the Appellate Court. She seeks permission to withdraw these
revision petitions by stating that the present petitions are not
maintainable and liberty be reserved with the petitioner to take
appropriate steps. She submits that certified copies filed along with
these petitions may be permitted to be taken back.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2
does not have any serious objection to the prayer made.
5. Accordingly, these revision petitions are permitted to be
withdrawn and liberty is reserved with the petitioners to take
appropriate steps as per law. Office is directed to hand over the
certified copies filed along with the revision petitions to the learned
counsel for the petitioners upon being replaced by the true copy
thereof.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Binit