IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 1027 of 2023
----------
Chandradeo Modi, son of late Firangi Modi, r/o. Punjabi Mohalla, Naya Bazar,
Lakhisari, P.O. & P.S. Lakhisari, Dist. Lakhisari (Bihar).
Petitioner
… …
- V E R S U S
–
1. The State of Jharkhand through Sri Chandrashekhar, Secretary, Rural
Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O.
& P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi.
2. Shri Zeeshan Quamer, Deputy Commissioner, P.O., P.S. & Dist.
Godda.
3. Shri Krishna Kumar Lal, Enginer-in-Chief, Project Building, P.O. &
P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi.
4. Dr. Khagen Mahato, Block Development Officer, P.O., P.S. & Dist.
Godda.
5. The State of Jharkhand.
Opp. Parties.
……..
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner : Mr. N.P. Choudhary, Advocate
For the O.P. : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III
----------
05/ 31.08.2024
The defects pointed-out by the Office is hereby ignored.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties
that the order of this Court has already been complied in true letter and
spirit and in compliance therefore, reasoned order has already been passed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same.
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite
parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the
same is dropped.
Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of.
However, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order,
if at all aggrieved by the same.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
kunal