Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jharkhand/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Krishnanand Mirdha vs. the State of Jharkhand

Decided on 31 August 2024• Citation: B.A./5023/2024• High Court of Jharkhand
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                        IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JHARKHAND   AT RANCHI                 
                                  B. A. No.5023 of 2024                             
                                       ....                                         
                 Krishnanand Mirdha, aged about 29 years, son of Rohit Mirdha,      
                 Resident of Village Aluwara, P.O. Patharda, P.S. Sarath            
                 (Patharda O.P.), District Deoghar, Jharkhand  .…   Petitioner      
                                       Versus                                       
                The State of Jharkhand                          .... Opposite Party 
                                       ....                                         
                 CORAM:      HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR                       
                 For the Petitioner    : Mr. A.K.Choudhary, Adv.                    
                 For the State         : Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P.                    
                                       ....                                         
                 05/31.08.2024                                                      
                 1.     The applicant who is in custody since 01.03.2024 has approached this
                 Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.25
                 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 419/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 & 120B
                 of IPC and Sections 66(B)/ 66(C)/ 66(D) & 84(C) of the Information Technology
                 Act, pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge,
                 Cyber Crime, Deoghar.                                              
                 2.     It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
                 complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
                 application and there is no suppression on his/her part.           
                 3      Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
                 participation in the trial. It has been submitted that he has been falsely implicated in
                 this case. It has been further submitted that the applicant is a private tutor having no
                 criminal antecedent. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
                 4.     Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
                 5.     Considering the above facts and the period of custody, I am inclined to
                 enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed
                 to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
                 Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
                 learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in
                 connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.25 of 2024, subject to condition
                 that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also
                 submit his mobile number before the learned court below which he will always
                 keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior
                 permission of the court.                                           
                                                              (Rajesh Kumar, J.)    
         Shahid/                                                                    
         uploaded