Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Jammu And Kashmir/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Zahir Abas and Others vs. Shazia Begum and Others

Decided on 30 September 2024• Citation: CM(M)/221/2024• High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                  Serial No. 3      
               HIGH   COURT    OF JAMMU     &  KASHMIR     AND  LADAKH              
                                       AT JAMMU                                     
             CM(M)  No. 221/2024                                                    
             CM No. 5592/2024                                                       
             Zahir Abas and others                                                  
                                                   …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)    
                              Through: Mr. Haroon Rashid Qureshi, Advocate.         
                          vs                                                        
             Shazia Begum and others                                                
                                                            .…. Respondent(s)       
                              Through: None.                                        
             Coram:                          RAJNESH   OSWAL,   JUDGE               
                     HON’BLE   MR.  JUSTICE                                         
                                        ORDER                                       
                                       30.09.2024                                   
                      ORAL                                                          
             1.       The petitioners have invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court
                      vested under Article 227 of the Constitution of the India for the
                      purpose of assailing the proceedings in the application filed by the
                      respondents under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic
                                                     Shazia Begum and others Vs.    
                      Violence Act (for short the Act) titled “                     
                      Zaheer Abbas and others pending before the court of learned Judicial
                                         ”                                          
                                st                                                  
                      Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar. Simultaneously, the petitioners have
                      also impugned the order dated 02.08.2024 by virtue of which, the
                      petitioner No. 1 has been directed to pay interim maintenance to the
                      tune of Rs. 5,000/- each to the respondents. The order impugned in
                      this petition is an ex parte interim order.                   

                                         2                                          
                                                    CM(M) No. 221/2024              
                                                    CM No. 5592/2024                
             2.       It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner
                      Nos. 2 to 6 have been unnecessarily arrayed as respondents in the
                      application filed by the respondents under Section 12 of the Act.
             3.       The petitioners have a remedy of approaching the court of learned
                                        st                                          
                      Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar to demonstrate that the  
                      petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 have been unnecessarily arrayed as respondents
                      in the application filed by the respondents i.e. applicants in the
                      application filed by them before the court of learned Judicial
                               st                                                   
                      Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar.                                  
             4.       In view of this, the present petition is disposed of by directing the
                      petitioners to raise all the issues raised by them in the present petition
                                                           st                       
                      before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar and
                      in the event the petitioners approach the concerned court by submitting
                      their response to the application filed by the respondents, the court of
                                              st                                    
                      learned Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar shall proceed in 
                      accordance with law.                                          
             5.       At this Stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
                      petitioner No. 1 is not a teacher by profession, whereas in the order
                      impugned before this Court, it has been mentioned that the petitioner
                      No. 1 is a teacher.                                           
             6.       The petitioner No. 1 can take this plea in his reply to the application
                      filed by the respondents by submitting before the court of learned
                                       st                                           
                      Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar that he is not a teacher by
                      profession.                                                   

                                         3                                          
                                                    CM(M) No. 221/2024              
                                                    CM No. 5592/2024                
             7.       It is made clear that in the event the petitioners herein file their
                      response on the next date of hearing before the court of learned
                                      st                                            
                      Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Mendhar, the learned Magistrate shall
                      endeavour to dispose of the application as expeditiously as possible in
                      accordance with the mandate of Protection of Women from Domestic
                      Violence Act, 2005.                                           
             8.       Disposed of.                                                  
                                                         (RAJNESH   OSWAL)          
                                                              JUDGE                 
             Jammu                                                                  
             30.09.2024                                                             
             Sahil Padha                                                            
                                 Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.             
                                 Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.           
       Sahil Padha                                                                  
       2024.10.03 12:37                                                             
       I attest to the accuracy and                                                 
       integrity of this document