Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Udho Ram vs. Sandeep Gupta

Decided on 30 September 2024• Citation: CMP/18470/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                     IN THE HIGH  COURT  OF HIMACHAL   PRADESH,   SHIMLA          
                                                        C.R. No.117 of 2023.      
                                                 Date of decision: 30.09.2024     
                    Udho Ram                                  ...Petitioner.      
                                       Versus                                     
                    Sandeep Gupta                           ...Respondent.        
                    Coram:                                                        
                    Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.                         
                    Whether approved for reporting?                               
                    For the petitioner :     Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the    
                                             petitioner.                          
                    For the respondent :     Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the  
                                             respondent.                          
                                             Mr. Sandeep Gupta, respondent-in     
                                             person.                              
                    Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge                                      
                                 CMP  No. 18470 of 2024.                          
                                  The petitioner has moved this application stating
                    therein that an oral settlement has taken place between the   
                    parties, wherein the petitioner/tenant has undertaken to vacate
                    the tenanted premises on or before 30.11.2024 and in lieu of this
                    the respondent/landlord has undertaken not to claim any use and
                    occupation charges or the rent and the arrears of rent, if any.
                                  The application is with the prayer that in view of
                    the oral settlement arrived at between the parties, the present
                    petition be disposed of and the petitioner be permitted to vacate
                    the premises on or before 30.11.2024.                         
                    Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

                                                -2-                               
                    2.                                                            
                                  Learned counsel for the respondent/landlord, on 
                    the basis of instructions imparted by Sh. Sandeep Gupta who is
                    present in the Court as identified by learned counsel, afÏrms the
                    settlement and understanding arrived at between the parties.  
                                  Learned counsel further submits that the        
                    respondent/landlord will not claim any use and occupation     
                    charges/arrears of rent, if any from the petitioner-tenant in case,
                    he vacates the tenanted premises by 30.11.2024.               
                    3.                                                            
                                  In view of the amicable settlement of dispute   
                    between the parties, the parties are directed to abide by the above
                    mutual settlement. In case the petitioner does not vacate the 
                    premises  by  30.11.2024, it  shall be  open   to  the        
                    respondent/landlord to take further action in accordance with 
                    law.                                                          
                    4.                                                            
                                  In view of above the Civil Revision Petition    
                    stands disposed of. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if
                    any, shall stands disposed of.                                
                                                   Jyotsna Rewal Dua              
                    30th September, 2024                Judge                     
                         (    )                                                   
                          manish